Why Choosing an Insurance Structure Requires a Team Approach

When it’s time to renew or restructure a workers’ compensation insurance program, many organizations default to a familiar pattern. The risk manager gathers quotes. The broker presents options. A decision gets made, often under time pressure, often by one or two people.

That approach misses something important. Choosing an insurance structure, whether guaranteed cost, a large deductible, a retrospective rating plan, a captive, or self-insurance, is not really an insurance decision. It’s a business decision with financial, operational, and legal implications that reach well beyond the insurance department. The organizations that make the best structure decisions rarely make them alone.

Why One Perspective Isn’t Enough

Each stakeholder in this decision sees a different part of the picture, and none of them sees all of it.

A risk manager understands claims history, loss trends, and how the organization has performed against similar structures in the past. A broker understands what’s available in the market and how different carriers and captive programs are structured. An actuary can translate loss history into meaningful projections about future cost and volatility. An attorney can flag contractual, regulatory, or liability issues buried in program agreements. Operational leadership understands what the business can realistically support in terms of claims oversight and internal process.

And finance, specifically a CFO or controller, understands something none of the others typically do: how collateral requirements affect available capital, how different structures affect cash flow and financial statements, and how retained risk compares to other uses of the organization’s money.

Leave any one of these perspectives out, and the decision gets made with a blind spot. A structure that looks financially attractive to a broker might create collateral demands the CFO never signed off on. A structure that appeals to finance might require a level of claims oversight the organization doesn’t currently have. The only way to catch these mismatches before they become expensive is to have the right people in the room before the decision, not after it.

What Gets Missed Without the Full Team

Organizations that skip this step tend to discover the gap later, and usually at a worse time than they’d like.

A company might select a large deductible program without fully accounting for the collateral it will tie up, only to find that capital constrained during an expansion. A group might join a captive without an honest assessment of its claims management maturity, only to see losses run higher than projected. A structure decision might get finalized without legal review, only to surface contract terms that create unexpected exposure years later. None of these outcomes reflect a bad structure. They reflect a decision made with an incomplete team.

Building the Right Team

Assembling this group doesn’t require a large committee or a lengthy process. It requires identifying the right people early and giving them a real voice in the decision, not just a summary after it’s been made.

At minimum, that typically includes:

• Risk management, to bring claims history and program performance
• A broker, to bring market knowledge and structure options
• An actuary, when loss projections are material to the decision
• Legal counsel, to review contractual and regulatory implications
• Finance leadership, to evaluate capital, collateral, and cash flow impact
• Operational leadership, to confirm the organization can support the oversight the structure will require

These stakeholders don’t need to meet constantly. They need to be involved at the right moments: when the organization’s risk tolerance is being defined, when structures are being compared, and before any final commitment is made.

Timing Matters as Much as Membership

Even the right team can produce a rushed decision if it’s assembled too late. Waiting until 30 days before renewal to bring in finance or legal leaves little room for a thoughtful evaluation of collateral, contract terms, or capital impact. The strongest decisions typically start this process months in advance, giving each stakeholder enough time to actually evaluate the options rather than simply react to a deadline.

A Better Question to Start With

Instead of asking “What quote looks best?” the more useful starting question is “Who needs to be part of this decision before we look at any quotes at all?” Organizations that answer that question well tend to choose structures that actually fit their financial capacity, their claims management maturity, and their long-term strategy. Organizations that skip it often find out what they missed only after the structure is already in place.

Insurance structure decisions are too consequential, and too cross-functional, to leave to one department. The strongest decisions come from teams, not individuals.

Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.

Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/

©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.