The Numbers Behind the Study
Researchers studied 157 injured workers who had suffered work-related concussions. Before the study began, these workers had already been off work for an average of ten months. Ten months is a remarkably long time for an injury commonly described as mild. By any reasonable measure, these were creeping catastrophic claims: ordinary head injuries that had quietly become long-duration, high-cost cases with no clear path back to work.
The intervention itself was not complicated or expensive. Each worker went through a neurocognitive screening evaluation, followed by a short, focused course of therapy built around psychoeducation and structured return-to-work planning. Most participants needed only a single session to see meaningful movement.
Click Link to Access Free PDF Download
“13 Research Studies to Prove Value of Return-to-Work Program & Gain Stakeholder Buy-In”
The results were striking. Average time from evaluation to return to work dropped to seven weeks. Ninety-nine percent of participants were released to full duty, with no restrictions and no accommodations required. Ten months of stagnation. Seven weeks to resolution. Same injury type, same population, dramatically different approach.
Why the Body Was Not the Problem
The physical injury in a concussion typically heals well before the worker actually returns to the job. What keeps someone out of work for months is rarely the brain injury itself. More often, it is fear, uncertainty, and a lack of clear direction about what recovery is supposed to look like day to day.
Workers who do not understand their symptoms often assume the worst. They worry that lingering headaches or difficulty concentrating signal permanent damage, even when nothing on the imaging supports that fear. Without someone walking them through what is normal and what to realistically expect, that uncertainty compounds. Weeks turn into months. Months turn into a claim nobody quite knows how to close, and a case file that keeps growing without anyone identifying why.
The screening and brief therapy model in this study addressed that uncertainty directly. It gave workers a clear, honest picture of their condition, reduced the fear driving their avoidance of work, and set concrete expectations for a realistic return-to-work timeline. Importantly, this was not open-ended psychotherapy or treatment for a diagnosed mental health disorder. It was short, structured, and built around a single measurable outcome: getting the person back to a productive, functioning life.
What This Means for Claims That Feel Stuck
Any claims manager who has watched a concussion claim drift well past the expected recovery window has likely assumed the case was simply complicated, unusual, or unlucky. This study suggests something different and more actionable. A meaningful share of these long-duration claims are not actually complicated. They are unaddressed.
The pattern echoes what shows up consistently across other creeping catastrophic claims: routine injuries that should resolve quickly instead spiral because the non-medical barriers to recovery never received attention. A concussion claim sitting open at four or five months without measurable progress is not automatically a lost cause or a permanent disability. It may simply be waiting for the right kind of structured intervention to arrive.
Applying This to Your Program
Employers do not need to run a clinical trial to benefit from this lesson. A handful of practical steps make the difference in an existing program. Flag concussion and mild traumatic brain injury claims early, especially any case still open well past the expected recovery window. Do not wait six or eight months before asking pointed questions about why progress has stalled.
Ask whether the worker has had a structured evaluation of both cognitive symptoms and psychological barriers, not just imaging results and a single neurologist’s clearance to return. Connect stalled claims with providers who specialize in short-term, goal-oriented therapy focused specifically on return to work, rather than general, open-ended mental health treatment.
Set clear expectations with the injured worker as early as possible. Uncertainty is often the single biggest driver of extended time away from work, and a clear explanation of the expected recovery path can reduce that uncertainty substantially.
FREE DOWNLOAD: “13 Research Studies to Prove Value of Return-to-Work Program & Gain Stakeholder Buy-In”
The Bigger Lesson
A ten-month claim that resolves in seven weeks is not a fluke or a statistical anomaly. It is a clear demonstration that even long-stalled claims can move quickly once the right kind of support gets involved at the right time.
Employers who assume a long-duration claim simply reflects how the injury naturally behaves may be missing the actual lever available to them. The physical injury heals. What often does not resolve on its own is the fear and uncertainty surrounding it. Address that directly, and the timeline can change dramatically, both for the injured worker’s life and for the overall cost of the claim.
Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.
Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/
Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/
©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.











