How to Score Your Workers’ Comp Program in Five Metrics

Most employers can tell you their total incurred losses for the year. Far fewer can tell you which single metric, if improved, would move that number the most. That’s not a knowledge problem. It’s a sequencing problem. Employers jump straight to solutions; a new vendor, a new safety poster, a new adjuster, without first figuring out where the biggest opportunity actually sits. The result is effort spread thin across a dozen initiatives instead of concentrated on the one or two that matter.

There’s a simple way to fix this: a baseline self-assessment. It takes about fifteen minutes, requires no software, and gives you a clear answer to the question, “Where should I focus first?”

Why a Baseline Matters

A baseline does two things. First, it tells you where you stand today. Second, it becomes the reference point you use to track progress. Without it, you’re managing by instinct, reacting to whichever claim is loudest this week rather than working a plan.

Think of your workers’ comp program the way you’d think of a physical. You don’t treat every symptom at once. You run the tests, see which numbers are out of range, and treat those first.

The Five Numbers to Score

Pull your most recent loss run and any benchmarking data you have (NCCI industry averages are a reasonable substitute if you don’t have your own trend history). Then score yourself on each of the following, using a 1-to-10 scale where 10 means “performing well above the industry average” and 1 means “performing well below it.”

• Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR). How does your claim frequency compare to your industry’s average? A high TRIR points to a safety and hiring problem, not a claims problem.
• Lag time. How many days pass between injury and claim reporting, on average? Longer lag time generally means worse outcomes across the board, because it delays medical direction, communication, and return-to-work planning.
• Lost-time / indemnity rate. What percentage of your claims involve indemnity payments rather than staying medical-only? A high percentage often signals a return-to-work gap.
• Litigation rate. What percentage of claims involve an attorney? This is frequently a communication and trust issue more than a legal one.
• Cost per claim / medical cost. Is your average claim costing more or less than your industry peers? This tells you whether severity, not frequency, is your bigger driver.

Reading Your Results

Once you’ve scored all five, look for the pattern. You might find you’re an 8 on TRIR and lag time but a 4 on return-to-work and litigation. That’s useful. It tells you your safety program and reporting process are working, and that your energy should go toward return-to-work and communication instead.

This is also where the “Russian doll” idea applies: each of these five numbers has its own drivers underneath it. A low return-to-work score might trace back to missing job descriptions, inconsistent supervisor training, or no relationship with an occupational medicine provider. The scorecard tells you which doll to open next, not every answer at once.

Avoid the Common Mistake

The most common mistake employers make with this exercise is trying to improve all five numbers simultaneously. That approach usually produces modest, forgettable progress everywhere instead of meaningful progress somewhere.

Pick the lowest score. Assign one person to own it. Set a realistic timeline. Revisit the scorecard again in three to six months to see whether that number moved and only then decide whether to shift focus to the next weakest area.

Make It a Habit, Not a One-Time Exercise

A baseline isn’t valuable if you run it once and file it away. Build it into your existing rhythm; a quarterly claims review, a leadership meeting, or an annual renewal prep session. Over time, the scorecard becomes less of a diagnostic and more of a report card on whether your management system is actually improving.

The goal isn’t a perfect score across the board. Few organizations have one. The goal is knowing, with confidence, which lever to pull next.

Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.

Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/

©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.