Why Some Claims Cost $2,600 and Others Cost $36,000

Most employers know some workers’ compensation claims become unexpectedly expensive. What they often do not know is which claims will spiral or how early those risks can actually be identified. That uncertainty creates one of the biggest frustrations in workers’ comp management. A routine strain suddenly becomes a six-figure claim, and by the time anyone realizes what is happening, the opportunity for early intervention is already gone.

But a large-scale screening initiative involving Safeway and Albertsons showed something remarkable:

High-risk claims are often predictable much earlier than employers think.

The Screening Project

The program involved:

• 290,000 employees,
• approximately 3,000 locations,
• and more than 11,000 workers’ compensation claim screenings.

The objective was simple:
identify which injured workers were at higher risk for delayed recovery and escalating claim costs.

The project focused heavily on psychosocial risk factors rather than just medical diagnoses. That distinction matters because many of the most expensive claims are not driven purely by physical injury severity. They are driven by fear, stress, anxiety, disengagement, financial pressure, and delayed return-to-work dynamics.

The Screening Process

The screening occurred primarily:

• two to four weeks after injury,
• when employees had not yet returned to work,
• or when claims showed abnormal recovery patterns.

The organization used screening techniques similar to the REBRO model, which evaluates:

• stress levels,
• emotional outlook,
• perceived pain burden,
• coping ability,
• and functional confidence.

The goal was not to diagnose mental health conditions. The goal was to identify workers who were at elevated risk for long-term disability and creeping catastrophic claim development.

The Results Were Eye-Opening

The cost differences between low-risk and high-risk claims were dramatic.

Claims categorized as low-risk averaged approximately:

• $2,600

Claims categorized as high-risk averaged approximately:

• $36,000

That is an enormous gap. The data confirmed what many claims professionals had suspected for years:
psychosocial risk factors strongly influence claim outcomes. But the study became even more compelling after intervention strategies were introduced.

The Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Impact

Workers identified as high-risk were referred into cognitive behavioral therapy programs.

These interventions focused on:

• coping skills,
• fear reduction,
• stress management,
• resiliency,
• and return-to-work confidence.

Importantly, this was not open-ended psychotherapy. It was short-term, goal-oriented support designed specifically to help injured workers recover and return to productive routines. The cost impact was significant. High-risk workers who participated in intervention programs produced dramatically better outcomes than comparable high-risk workers who did not receive intervention support.

The lesson was clear:
early identification alone is valuable, but early intervention changes outcomes.

Why This Matters So Much

Many employers still approach workers’ compensation reactively. They wait for claims to become expensive before escalating attention. The Safeway project showed why that approach fails.

By the time a claim has been out of control for six or eight months:

• behaviors are entrenched,
• work disconnection is deeper,
• fear has increased,
• and returning to work becomes psychologically harder.

Early screening changes the timeline. Instead of reacting late, employers gain the opportunity to intervene while recovery momentum can still be redirected.

What Employers Should Learn From This

The biggest takeaway is not necessarily the specific screening tool. It is the mindset shift.

Strong workers’ compensation programs no longer rely solely on injury diagnosis to predict outcomes. They evaluate the entire recovery picture:

• emotional state,
• participation behaviors,
• communication patterns,
• confidence levels,
• and psychosocial stressors.

That broader approach allows employers to recognize high-risk claims while there is still time to help.

Building a Predictive Claims Strategy

Organizations do not need massive budgets or sophisticated technology to begin applying these concepts. Several practical steps can create meaningful improvement.

1. Monitor Claims at the Two-to-Four Week Mark

Claims that are not progressing normally within the first month deserve closer attention. This is often where early warning signs begin appearing.

2. Watch Participation Behaviors

Missed appointments, communication withdrawal, and refusal of modified duty are often stronger predictors than medical reports alone.

3. Use Structured Screening Tools

Validated tools such as:

• REBRO Short Form,
• PHQ-4,
• or other psychosocial assessments

can help organizations identify elevated risk consistently.

4. Coordinate Early Intervention

Once high-risk workers are identified, employers should respond quickly through:

• nurse case management,
• cognitive behavioral support,
• transitional duty planning,
• and enhanced communication.

5. Strengthen Fundamentals First

Screening tools work best when foundational systems already exist:

• strong return-to-work programs,
• fast injury reporting,
• supervisor training,
• and proactive communication.

Without those fundamentals, even the best predictive systems lose effectiveness.

The Bigger Opportunity

The Safeway screening project reinforced a powerful truth about workers’ compensation: The most expensive claims rarely become catastrophic overnight.

They evolve gradually through delayed recovery, disengagement, stress, and lost momentum. Employers who identify those risks early gain the opportunity to change the outcome entirely.

That means fewer runaway claims.
Lower overall costs.
Faster recoveries.
And most importantly, healthier outcomes for injured workers.

Predictive screening is not about labeling employees. It is about recognizing when someone may need more support before a manageable injury becomes a life-changing problem.

Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.

Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/

©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.