The Hidden Costs of a Bad Hire: Why Employers Can’t Afford to Ignore Hiring Risks

Hiring new employees is often viewed as a fast-paced race to fill open roles. Production deadlines are looming, teams are understaffed, and the pressure to “get someone in the door” often outweighs the discipline of a thorough vetting process. But when it comes to the workers’ compensation system, a rushed or poorly evaluated hire can be far more costly than leaving a role vacant for a few extra weeks.

In fact, bad hires aren’t just a performance issue—they are a financial and legal liability, particularly in industries where physical labor increases the risk of injury. Here’s why employers must start treating hiring as a risk management function, and what they can do to mitigate the hidden costs.

The Financial Toll of a Bad Hire

It’s tempting to see a bad hire as a simple mistake—someone who didn’t “work out.” But research shows the financial consequences go far deeper. According to a CareerBuilder study cited in Workers’ Comp Mastery Training, 75% of companies say they’ve been impacted by a bad hire, with 41% reporting losses of $25,000 or more, and 24% saying the cost exceeded $50,000.

That figure includes:

• Lost productivity

• Increased supervision time

• Wasted recruiting and onboarding costs

• Reputational damage

• And, crucially, increased risk of injury and workers’ comp claims

The U.S. Department of Labor estimates the cost of a bad hire may reach 30% of that employee’s first-year earnings—a staggering number when you multiply it across multiple roles or repeat hiring cycles.

First-Year Employees Drive Claims and Costs

Beyond poor performance, bad hires can quickly become workplace injury liabilities. Multiple studies show that injuries are far more likely—and more severe—within the first year of employment. For instance:

• A Travelers 2024 Injury Impact Report found that 35% of all injuries occur in the first year, leading to 6 million lost workdays.

• A separate study on job tenure and injury rates revealed that employees are 4–6 times more likely to get injured in their first month compared to after a year of service.

• First-year injuries also result in 2–4 times higher claim costs, as employees lack familiarity with the role, work environment, and safety protocols.

In some sectors, the numbers are even more stark: 52% of all restaurant industry claims come from employees in their first year.

Why the Wrong Hire is a Risk Multiplier

So what’s causing this surge in early-stage injuries and costly claims?

Part of it comes down to misalignment between employee capabilities and job demands. Employers often skip key vetting processes—like verifying physical fitness for the role, screening for values and behaviors, or ensuring candidates fully understand the job—because they need to hire fast.

Additionally, new hires may be:

• Unfamiliar with safety procedures

• Undertrained in task execution

• Ill-suited for the physical or mental demands of the position

• Unengaged or even actively disengaged, making them more likely to cut corners or ignore safety protocols

One Gallup poll found that only 30% of employees are actively engaged, while 18% are actively disengaged—a segment that poses a clear risk to team safety, morale, and performance.

The Solution: Hire with Risk in Mind

Hiring the right people isn’t about luck—it’s about systems. Employers who succeed in reducing workers’ comp exposure have a hiring process that’s proactive, consistent, and data-driven.

Key components include:

• Integrity Testing
  Identify red flags like dishonesty, hostility, or substance abuse before wasting time on interviews or onboarding.

• Conditional Offers with Objective Testing
  Ensure new hires can safely perform essential job duties using post-offer physical testing, linked to verified job descriptions.

• Baseline Health Assessments
  Document pre-existing conditions so you’re not held liable for unrelated injuries, and use this data to support smarter return-to-work strategies.

• Structured Onboarding with Mentorship
  Don’t throw new hires into the deep end. Provide gradual exposure to hazards, safety-focused training, and ongoing support.

By taking the time to properly screen, test, and onboard employees, companies can avoid hiring missteps that lead to injuries, lawsuits, and high turnover.

The ROI of Getting It Right

Implementing a robust hiring system may require upfront investment—whether in testing platforms, physical exams, or job description audits. But the return is clear: lower injury rates, fewer claims, more engaged employees, and significantly reduced comp costs.

For companies serious about improving their workers’ comp outcomes, hiring must become a strategic priority—not just a transactional task. The costs of a bad hire are too high to ignore. The rewards of hiring the right way are too big to overlook.

Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.

Contact: [email protected].

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/

©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.