Who Should Be in Your Workers’ Comp Claim Review Meetings?

Many employers assume the more people they invite to a workers’ compensation claim review, the more productive the meeting will be. It sounds logical. If the adjuster, broker, nurse case manager, HR manager, safety director, supervisors, medical providers, attorneys, and executives are all in the room, surely better decisions will be made. Unfortunately, that’s rarely what happens.

Instead, the meeting runs long. Conversations drift away from the issues that matter. People spend time discussing details they don’t need to know. And everyone leaves wondering whether anything meaningful was actually accomplished.

The problem isn’t that too many people care about the claim. The problem is that different claim reviews have different purposes. Understanding who should attend each type of claim review and what should be discussed can dramatically improve the effectiveness of your workers’ compensation program.

Not Every Claim Review Should Look the Same

One of the biggest mistakes employers make is treating every claim review as if it serves the same objective. It doesn’t. A weekly operational meeting is very different from a quarterly executive review. Trying to accomplish both goals during the same meeting usually results in accomplishing neither.

Instead, think of claim reviews in three levels:

• Weekly meetings focus on execution.
• Monthly meetings identify patterns.
• Quarterly meetings evaluate business performance.

Each level requires different participants and different conversations.

Weekly Meetings Solve Today’s Problems

Imagine an employee strains their shoulder on Tuesday morning. By the end of the week, your claims review shouldn’t be focused on long-term strategy. It should answer simple operational questions.

Was the injury reported immediately?

Did the employee receive medical care?

Has the supervisor checked on the employee?

Was work status received from the treating provider?

Has transitional duty been offered?

If one of those steps didn’t happen, the meeting identifies the breakdown before the claim has a chance to deteriorate. These meetings are typically owned by the employer’s internal workers’ compensation team, HR, safety, or operations managers. The objective is execution. Small problems caught early rarely become expensive claims later.

Monthly Meetings Look for Patterns

One delayed injury report may simply be a mistake. Ten delayed injury reports usually indicate a process problem. This is where many employers miss an enormous opportunity.

Instead of simply reviewing another list of open claims, monthly meetings should begin asking a different question:

What are these claims telling us about our system?

Perhaps one location consistently reports injuries several days late. Maybe one supervisor rarely contacts injured employees after an accident. Perhaps return-to-work delays occur in one department but nowhere else. Those are no longer claim problems. They’re operational patterns.

Monthly meetings are where claims adjusters, brokers, occupational medical providers, and other claims partners can provide tremendous value by helping identify recurring issues that deserve attention before they become larger organizational problems.

Quarterly Meetings Focus on Business Impact

Senior leadership should absolutely be involved in workers’ compensation. Just not necessarily every week. A CEO doesn’t need to spend an hour discussing whether an employee’s next physical therapy appointment is scheduled for Tuesday or Thursday. However, leadership should absolutely care if litigation rates have doubled over the past year. Or if one facility consistently reports injuries five days later than every other location. Or if return-to-work performance continues to decline across the organization. Those aren’t individual claim discussions. Those are business discussions.

Quarterly reviews should focus on questions like:

• Are we reducing litigation?
• Is lag time improving?
• Are injured employees returning to work more quickly?
• Are certain locations consistently underperforming?
• What financial impact are these trends having on the organization?

These are the conversations executives are uniquely positioned to influence. They allocate resources. They establish accountability. They remove barriers that operational teams often cannot.

More People Doesn’t Mean Better Meetings

One of the easiest ways to waste everyone’s time is inviting every stakeholder to every meeting. Executives become frustrated discussing operational details. Adjusters become frustrated sitting through strategic conversations that don’t require their participation. Managers lose valuable time attending meetings where they have little ability to influence the discussion.

Instead, participation should match the purpose of the meeting. Operational meetings need operational decision-makers. Strategic meetings need strategic decision-makers. When the right people attend the right meetings, conversations become shorter, decisions become clearer, and accountability improves.

Claim Reviews Should Improve More Than Individual Claims

Many organizations believe the purpose of a claim review is to understand the status of each claim. That’s only part of the objective. The greater opportunity is understanding what each claim reveals about the workers’ compensation system itself.

Individual claims provide information. Patterns identify weaknesses. Leadership creates improvement. When employers consistently review claims through that lens, meetings become much more than routine status updates. They become one of the primary tools for continuously improving the workers’ compensation program.

Over time, those improvements lead to faster reporting, stronger communication, better return-to-work outcomes, fewer litigated claims, and ultimately lower workers’ compensation costs. A meaningful claim review isn’t determined by how many people attended. It’s determined by whether the right people were in the room discussing the right issues—and whether something actually changed afterward.

Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.

Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/

©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.