During the course of business, employers will find that all employees are not the same. Speaking differently to each employee in order to get the same result is normal and necessary to keep business flowing steadily each day. It only stands to reason that the same approach should hold true when working with employees to get them quickly and safely back to work after a worker’s compensation claim.
Return to Work Approach With Four Different Employee Personalities
There are many different return-to-work programs that can be utilized, but they should be matched with specific employees’ personalities to get the most successful results. While one employee may respond well to several phone calls a week, another may find that to be too intrusive. Finding the balance is the key to getting employees back to work.
Click Link to Access Free PDF Download
“13 Research Studies to Prove Value of Return-to-Work Program & Gain Stakeholder Buy-In”
There are primarily four different employee personality types ranging from fully satisfied to completely unsatisfied. The four types of employees:
- Satisfied-Active– one who is happy and needs no coercion or prodding to return to work.
- Satisfied-Passive– one who is happy, but complacent with staying out of work.
- Dissatisfied-Passive– one who is unhappy, but does not willfully concoct schemes to stay out of work. However, they may take advantage of the system to stay out longer.
- Dissatisfied-Active– one who is very unhappy with his/her situation and will actively attempt to take advantage of the system.
The majority of employees will fall under one of these description categories and will respond similarly to different return-to-work strategies. Handling each situation according to the employees’ personalities is the best tactic.
Suit The Personality Of The Employee
For example, a satisfied-active employee might be someone who has not missed a day of work in 10 years, plays on the company softball team and is always looked to as a go-getter. A workers’ comp claim might be perceived as a setback to this type of individual, and little or no interaction from the employer will be necessary to get him to return to work. A recommended strategy is to send a get-well card and provide a transitional duty position; activity such as aggressive surveillance can have the opposite effect and make the employee unwilling to return to work.
An active-dissatisfied employee in the same situation will take a completely different approach and most likely abuse the system. Employers of active-dissatisfied employees will need to take a much more severe approach, including implementing fraud prevention measures, hiring investigators, and having almost constant contact with the employee to get him back to work.
FREE DOWNLOAD: “13 Research Studies to Prove Value of Return-to-Work Program & Gain Stakeholder Buy-In”
Without using a different return-to-work approach to suit the employee’s personality, the employer can inadvertently stall the process.
Author Michael Stack, CEO Amaxx LLC. He is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and helps employers reduce their workers’ comp costs by 20% to 50%. He works as a consultant to large and mid-market clients, is a co-author of Your Ultimate Guide To Mastering Workers Comp Costs, a comprehensive step-by-step manual of cost containment strategies based on hands-on field experience, and is the founder & lead trainer of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center, which offers the Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation national designation.
Contact: [email protected].
Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/
©2022 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.