The Benchmark Data That Puts Your Company on OSHA’s Radar

Most employers assume OSHA inspections happen for one of two reasons. Either something went badly wrong, or an employee filed a complaint. Both are true. But there is a third path, and it has nothing to do with a specific incident at your company.

OSHA also selects inspection targets using data. Specifically, it compares your organization’s injury and illness rates against industry benchmarks, and outliers get attention.

What OSHA Is Actually Comparing

Every employer required to maintain OSHA logs is contributing to a national dataset. That data allows OSHA to establish expected performance ranges by industry. When a company reports numbers that fall well outside the expected range for its industry classification, that gap becomes visible to the agency long before an inspector ever walks through the door.

DART rate is one of the clearest signals in this process. DART tracks injuries resulting in days away from work, restricted duty, or job transfers. If your industry typically sees a DART rate in a certain range and your organization reports numbers significantly higher, that discrepancy stands out in the data OSHA reviews as part of its site-specific targeting program.

Fatalities factor in as well. So do patterns across multiple reporting periods rather than a single unusual year. A one-time spike tied to a clearly explainable event is very different, in OSHA’s eyes, from a sustained pattern of underperformance relative to industry peers.

This is not a punitive system by design. It is a resource allocation system. OSHA cannot inspect every workplace in the country, so it uses data to identify where inspection is likely to produce the greatest safety improvement for the fewest resources spent.

Why This Should Change How You View Your Numbers

Many employers treat their OSHA data as a backward-looking compliance record, something you file every March and forget about until next year. Site-specific targeting is a reminder that this data has a forward-looking function too.

If your recordable rate or DART rate has been climbing over several reporting periods, or sitting well above your industry peers, that is not just a metric worth discussing internally. It is a pattern that may eventually draw external attention, and it is far better to identify and address that pattern yourself than to have OSHA identify it for you.

The good news is that the same data you would use to catch this internally is the data OSHA is already reviewing externally. You have access to the same public benchmarking tables OSHA uses. The Bureau of Labor Statistics publishes industry-level injury and illness data that lets you compare your own rates before anyone else does, at no cost and with no need to subscribe to anything.

Using Benchmarking Proactively

The practical takeaway is straightforward. Do not wait for an inspection to tell you that your numbers look unusual for your industry.

Pull your TRIR and DART rate. Compare them against your industry’s published averages using the same public tables OSHA relies on. If your numbers are in line, that is useful confirmation that your safety program is performing as expected relative to your peers. If your numbers are significantly worse than your industry average, that is a signal worth acting on before it becomes someone else’s discovery.

This is particularly important for organizations with multiple locations. A company-wide average can hide the fact that one facility is driving the numbers well outside the expected range while others perform normally. Location-level benchmarking reveals which sites deserve closer attention long before an inspector, or a company-wide average, would ever reveal the problem.

The Larger Point

Site-specific targeting is a reminder that your safety data does not exist in isolation. It is compared, evaluated, and acted upon, both internally and externally, whether or not you are the one doing the comparing.

Organizations that treat their OSHA numbers as a genuine management tool rather than a filing obligation are the ones least likely to be surprised by what that comparison reveals. They are also the organizations most likely to catch a declining trend early, while it is still a training conversation rather than an inspection finding.

The data is public. The benchmarks are available. The formulas are the same ones OSHA itself uses. The only real question is whether you look at them before OSHA does, and whether you act on what you find.

Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.

Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/

©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.