Unfortunately, many return-to-work (RTW) programs miss the mark. Instead of meaningful tasks, some employees are handed low-value work—filing papers, organizing a back closet, or metaphorically counting paperclips. While these assignments might satisfy technical requirements, they can actually harm recovery, morale, and claim outcomes in significant ways.
Let’s explore why this approach fails and how employers can create more thoughtful, collaborative RTW strategies that actually work.
The Traditional Trap: Light Duty Without Purpose
In traditional RTW models, the employer often follows a rigid sequence:
Click Link to Access Free PDF Download
“13 Research Studies to Prove Value of Return-to-Work Program & Gain Stakeholder Buy-In”
-
Get medical restrictions from the treating physician.
-
Assign the employee a light-duty task that falls within those restrictions.
-
Require the employee to return immediately, regardless of the assignment’s substance.
This often results in what’s known as a “make-work” job: something that keeps the employee busy but serves no real purpose—either to the business or the worker.
Examples include:
-
Shuffling papers that no one will read
-
Sitting at a desk with nothing to do
-
“Helping” in a storage room for eight hours a day
While the intention might be to comply with RTW best practices, the unintended consequences are damaging.
Why Busywork Backfires
-
Psychological Harm
Meaningless work can feel insulting or degrading to employees who were previously in demanding, skilled roles. It sends a message that they’re not truly valued—and that the company only cares about avoiding lost-time claims. -
Increased Frustration and Resistance
When employees feel their transitional duty is a punishment or a “gotcha,” they’re more likely to resist participation, delay recovery, or even seek legal representation. This leads to prolonged claims and higher costs. -
Loss of Engagement
Disconnected from their team and regular responsibilities, injured workers may begin to mentally check out. This disengagement can extend the recovery timeline, reduce morale, and increase turnover risk. -
Triggers for Psychosocial Barriers
Tasks that lack purpose can exacerbate psychosocial risk factors such as depression, anxiety, and perceived injustice. These barriers are strongly correlated with delayed recovery and poor claim outcomes.
A Better Approach: Collaborative Return-to-Work
Instead of assigning tasks to injured workers, effective employers work with them to find appropriate roles. A collaborative return-to-work model includes:
-
Input from the injured employee
-
Participation from supervisors and department heads
-
Coordination with treating physicians or medical advisors
-
Case manager involvement when appropriate
By giving the worker a voice in the process, the company sends a clear message:
“We value you, and we’re committed to helping you get better.”
How to Create Meaningful Transitional Duty
Here are steps employers can take to ensure assignments support—not sabotage—recovery:
1. Develop a Transitional Duty Job Bank
Maintain a list of pre-identified, medically appropriate tasks across departments. This allows for quick placement in meaningful roles, not last-minute busywork.
2. Ask Supervisors for Wish Lists
Department heads often have tasks they’ve been putting off—training documentation, safety audits, data cleanup. These can be productive projects for recovering employees.
3. Tailor Work to Medical Restrictions
Transitional duty should never exceed the employee’s physical limitations. But there’s almost always a way to adjust schedules, equipment, or duties to meet restrictions.
4. Rotate Tasks When Appropriate
If no single role can keep the employee engaged for a full day, consider rotating them through different departments or projects to keep the work stimulating and relevant.
5. Check In Regularly
Meet weekly with the injured employee to assess how things are going. Ask for feedback and adjust tasks as their recovery progresses. This reinforces that the program is built around support, not control.
Transitional Duty Is a Bridge, Not a Box
The goal of transitional duty is to help employees gradually increase their time and capability until they can return to full-duty work. It’s a bridge—between injury and full recovery—not a holding cell.
Done right, transitional duty:
-
Reinforces identity and belonging
-
Keeps employees connected to the workplace
-
Encourages faster recovery
-
Reduces the likelihood of litigation
-
Lowers total claim costs
But when it’s reduced to paperclip-counting, the program fails both the worker and the organization.
FREE DOWNLOAD: “13 Research Studies to Prove Value of Return-to-Work Program & Gain Stakeholder Buy-In”
Final Thoughts
The next time you’re assigning transitional duty, ask yourself:
Would I feel respected doing this work? Would I find purpose in it?
If the answer is “no,” it’s time to rethink the approach.
Because when you respect the person—not just the policy—you’ll see better outcomes across the board.
Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.
Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.
Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/
Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/
©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.











