• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
 

Amaxx Workers Comp Blog

Reduce Workers Compensation Costs By 20-50%

Header Right

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help
  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Claims Resolution and Settlement / Medicare Set Asides (MSAs) / Case Study: $101,312 Savings Through MSA Amended Review Process

Case Study: $101,312 Savings Through MSA Amended Review Process

July 1, 2020 By //  by Michael B. Stack

Reduce your workers' comp case study Not every workers’ compensation claim gets settled on the first try — even when there has been a Medicare Set-Aside approved by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Thankfully, there is a policy that allows for a ‘re-do’ of many such cases, allowing for settlement years later.

Called the Amended Review Process, it enables stakeholders to seek a new CMS-approved MSA. When medical treatment requirements have changed over the years, the process can save potentially many thousands of dollars, while still ensuring sufficient money for the injured worker’s future medical care.

The Policy

CMS adopted the process several years ago to facilitate settlements where a previous effort had failed. In the past, the agency would rarely review a new MSA proposal that was based on post-submission medical records and pharmacy history, once an MSA had already been approved. An injured worker whose medical care had been reduced years later, would not be able to get approval for a revised MSA.

Of course, not every previously-approved MSA can be submitted for a re-review. CMS has several caveats:

  • CMS has issued a conditional approval/approved amount at least 12 but no more than 72 months prior,
  • The case has not yet settled as of the date of the request for re-review.
  • Projected care has changed so much that the submitter’s new proposed amount would result in a 10% or $10,000 change (whichever is greater) in CMS’ previously approved amount.
    Click Link to Access Free PDF Download

    “8 ‘Think Outside the Box’ Tactics to Settle Workers’ Comp Claims”

With the right combination of accurate information and expertise in MSA-related issues, more cases are likely to settle the second time around.

Case Study: (Provided by Tower MSA Partners): $101,312 Savings Through Amended Review Process

Challenge

CMS had approved an MSA for an injured worker in 2015 in the amount of $147,483, but the parties were unable to settle. Four years later, the injured worker was again interested in settling the claim. However, the MSA approved in 2015 was no longer an accurate representation of the worker’s future medical needs.

In the past, this claim would likely not have settled, causing distress for the payer and injured worker alike. But the use of the Amended Review Process coupled with medical expertise and detection led to a win-win for all.

Solution

A look at medical records produced evidence that the injured worker was no longer using a supplemental oxygen delivery system. Additionally, the worker had replaced brand-name Crestor with a less expensive, but equally effective generic drug prescribed for high cholesterol.

CMS stipulates that a change from brand-name to generic drugs cannot be the only reason for the Amended Review request. However, it can be included when additional changes are involved, such as the unnecessary inclusion of the oxygen delivery system.

Having this information at hand was the first step to gaining a re-review from CMS. However, equally important was the medical legwork required to secure proof of the changes in medical treatment.

Tower’s Physician Follow-up service was used to get a signed statement from the treating physician confirming the oxygen system had been discontinued and that the patient was using a generic version of Crestor.

Armed with the required documentation, Tower submitted a revised MSA to CMS in the amount of $46,171.

FREE DOWNLOAD: “8 ‘Think Outside the Box’ Tactics to Settle Workers’ Comp Claims”

Results

CMS’ approval of the revised MSA four years later resulted in savings of $101,312 and met the injured worker’s future medical needs. The case is a classic example of how a high-dollar MSA that leads to a breakdown in the settlement process can be turned around several years later when there are changes in the medical regimen.

Conclusion

There are multiple reasons a workers’ compensation claim doesn’t settle, even if the parties seem motivated. The Amended Review process, used in conjunction with proactive medical and MSA expertise, can be a valuable tool to move these claims to settlement.

A common corollary question to the Amended Review process is whether you can settle based upon an MSA which was approved years ago. The answer is yes, even if the allocation no longer accurately accounts for future medical, CMS will allow parties to use the old approved MSA in the settlement.

Michael Stack - Amaxx Author Michael Stack, CEO Amaxx LLC. He is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and helps employers reduce their workers’ comp costs by 20% to 50%. He works as a consultant to large and mid-market clients, is a co-author of Your Ultimate Guide To Mastering Workers Comp Costs, a comprehensive step-by-step manual of cost containment strategies based on hands-on field experience, and is founder & lead trainer of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center , which offers the Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation national designation.

Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: https://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

©2020 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.

FREE DOWNLOAD: “8 ‘Think Outside the Box’ Tactics to Settle Workers’ Comp Claims”

Filed Under: Medicare Set Asides (MSAs)

Related Articles

Medicare Secondary Payer Update: What to Know Heading Into 2024

Medicare Secondary Payer Update: What to Know Heading Into 2024

Section 111 Reporting Monetary Penalties Are Here

Section 111 Reporting Monetary Penalties Are Here

MSP Manual Update Puts MSAs into Motion at Provider Level

MSP Manual Update Puts MSAs into Motion at Provider Level

MD Law Firm Settles with DOJ for Failure to Reimburse Conditional Payments

MD Law Firm Settles with DOJ for Failure to Reimburse Conditional Payments

Section 111 Civil Monetary Penalty Rulemaking is Delayed

Section 111 Civil Monetary Penalty Rulemaking is Delayed

2023 MMSEA Section 111 Reporting Updates

2023 MMSEA Section 111 Reporting Updates

Social Security Disability, Medicare, and Medicaid; Oh My!

Social Security Disability, Medicare, and Medicaid; Oh My!

Preparing for the Final Rule: Section 111 Common Mistakes, Misconceptions and Mishaps

Preparing for the Final Rule: Section 111 Common Mistakes, Misconceptions and Mishaps

Tips and Traps to Effective Medicare Secondary Payer Compliance

Tips and Traps to Effective Medicare Secondary Payer Compliance

Tips and Traps to Effective Medicare Secondary Payer Compliance

Tips and Traps to Effective Medicare Secondary Payer Compliance

Experts Explain How to Prevent Losing Continuation of Care Post-Settlement

Experts Explain How to Prevent Losing Continuation of Care Post-Settlement

Medicare Secondary Payer Compliance Claim Handling Tips

Medicare Secondary Payer Compliance Claim Handling Tips

Free Download

8 'Think Outside The Box' Tactics To Settle Workers' Comp Claims - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Train to Succeed

BECOME CERTIFIED IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Proven Course Catalog & WC Toolbox Give You The Power To Achieve Lower Costs and Better Injured Worker Outcomes

VISIT WORKERS' COMP TRAINING CENTER

Previous Post: « Ambulatory Surgery Centers vs. Hospital Outpatient Departments. Which Is Better?
Next Post: Effective Mediation Tips for Claim Handlers »

Primary Sidebar

FREE DOWNLOAD

8 'Think Outside The Box' Tactics To Settle Workers' Comp Claims - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Our Sponsors

Catastrophic and Risk Solutions, Case Management Solutions, and Specialty Networks
 

WC Cost-Driver Metrics Suite

Blog Categories

Search Our Archive

Subscribe to Our FREE Newsletter

Return-to-Work Essentials

Footer

Search Our Archive

Search our continually growing archive of over 5,000 articles about Workers' Comp issues.

Quiclinks

  • Calculators
  • Terms & Abbreviations
  • Glossary of WC Premium Terms
  • WC Resources
  • Best Practices
  • Industries
  • Return-to-Work Essentials

RSS Recent Blog Posts

  • Building Partnerships, Not Transactions: The Secret to Better Claims Outcomes
  • Building Your Workers’ Comp Dream Team
  • Your Workers’ Comp Oasis: Why Vision Comes Before Action
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FEE NEWSLETTER
Let Us Help You Stomp Down the High Cost of Workers' Comp!
Top of Page ↑
  • Home
  • Training Center
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Products
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Login
Copyright © 2025 Amaxx, LLC. All Rights Reserved. · Privacy Policy / Legal Notice