• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
 

Amaxx Workers Comp Blog

Reduce Workers Compensation Costs By 20-50%

Header Right

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help
  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Buyers Guide: Workers Compensation Insurance / Insurance Issues, Rates, Premiums / Medical Payments Per Claim in Massachusetts Are Lower Than Many Other States

Medical Payments Per Claim in Massachusetts Are Lower Than Many Other States

August 10, 2009 By //  by Robert Elliott, J.D. Leave a Comment

Medical Payments per Claim for Massachusetts Comp Claims Low, But Climbing

Workers’ Compensation Research Institute (WCRI) CompScopeTM Medical Benchmarks for Massachusetts, 9th Edition, reported employers in Massachusetts paid an average of just over $5,100 for 2006 claims with experience through March 2007. Medical payments per workers’ compensation claim in Massachusetts were the lowest of 14 states, despite steady increases since 2001 according to the study.

A key driver for lower medical payments was lower prices paid for nonsurgical services, related to the lowest non-hospital provider fee schedule in the nation.

Despite lower-than-typical fee schedule rates for all service categories including surgery, the study found prices paid for surgeries were higher in Massachusetts compared to other study states. Massachusetts employers and insurers often negotiated surgery prices higher than the fee schedule, particularly for orthopedic surgeries.

WCRI observed recent regulations in the form of fee schedule changes, effective April 1, 2009, focused on this issue. Fees for many surgical procedures were increased to reflect current rates being paid, raising fees in some cases two to three times above the 2004 fee schedule rates.

Another provision of the revised fee schedule increased physician fees by 10% to 20%, except for anesthesia and surgery, which were the subject of larger increases. At the same time, hospital reimbursement rates were generally decreased.

Medical payments per claim in Massachusetts were lower for nearly all providers-both non-hospital and hospital-compared to the typical study state.

For example, payments to physicians were 42% lower than the median of the 14 states, mainly due to fewer physician visits and fewer services per visit. Utilization for non-hospital providers in Massachusetts was the lowest among the study states.

In addition, fewer claims received specialty services, such as minor radiology and physical medicine from non-hospital providers. Conversely, these services (and evaluation and management) were provided more often in a hospital outpatient setting in Massachusetts than in the typical study state.

Payments per claim for hospital outpatient services in Massachusetts were about half the amount paid in the typical study state. The lower payments per claim for hospital outpatient services may be partially due to a higher percentage of general outpatient care billed by hospitals in Massachusetts compared to other study states, services likely to be billed as non-hospital services in other states.

As a result, the mix of services provided in the hospital outpatient setting was less intense in Massachusetts than in the typical study state.

The lower payments per service for hospital outpatient services are likely due to the provider fee schedule applied to hospital outpatient services when it is determined the service can be safely provided outside the hospital setting. Hospital inpatient payments per claim were lower than typical of the study states, and a lower percentage of cases involved an inpatient stay.

However, medical payments per claim in Massachusetts increased steadily 9% to 12% per year from 2001 to 2005; and at a slightly slower rate, 7% in 2006 for claims with 12 months of experience.

In 2006, payments per claim to non-hospital providers were stable or falling, due mainly to fewer visits per claim; prices paid were stable. The payments per claim for hospital outpatient services had moderate growth since 2004, mainly driven by increases in payments per service for hospital outpatient services. (workersxzcompxzkit)

To order this report, go to the WCRI Web site: http://www.wcrinet.org/.

Author Robert Elliott, senior vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers’ Compensation costs, including airlines, health care, manufacturing, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. He can be contacted at: Robert_Elliott@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com or 860-786-8286.

Try Our FREE Score
WC Best Practices Quick Check: http://www.workerscompkit.com/intro/
WC 101: www.ReduceYourWorkersComp.com/workers_comp.php
Do not use this information without independent verification.
All state laws vary.

©2008 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@WorkersCompKit.com

Filed Under: Insurance Issues, Rates, Premiums, Medical Issues Tagged With: Medical Issues, Premiums, Rates

Related Articles

Who’s Really Running Your Claims?

Who’s Really Running Your Claims?

Insurance Math Uncovered: Losses, Expenses, Profit

Insurance Math Uncovered: Losses, Expenses, Profit

Play It Safe or Bet on Yourself?

Play It Safe or Bet on Yourself?

Understanding Classification Rules in Workers’ Compensation

Understanding Classification Rules in Workers’ Compensation
employee class code

Know Your Correct Job Classification Codes To Save Workers’ Comp Costs

Know Your Correct Job Classification Codes To Save Workers’ Comp Costs

Workers Compensation Insurance Premium Audits

Workers Compensation Insurance Premium Audits

When To Start Preparing For your Workers’ Comp Premium Audit

When To Start Preparing For your Workers’ Comp Premium Audit

2 Workers’ Comp Payroll Deductions Employers Often Miss

2 Workers’ Comp Payroll Deductions Employers Often Miss

Experience Modification Method To Calculate Workers Comp Premium

Experience Modification Method To Calculate Workers Comp Premium

Correctly Calculate the Average Weekly Wage

Correctly Calculate the Average Weekly Wage

Independent Contractors in Workers’ Compensation: When Are They Really An Employee?

Independent Contractors in Workers’ Compensation: When Are They Really An Employee?

Understanding the HIGH Cost of Selecting the LOW Price Work Comp Proposal

Understanding the HIGH Cost of Selecting the LOW Price Work Comp Proposal

Free Download

Workers' Comp Claims Review Checklist: 9 Must-Have, Serious-Impact Elements - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Train to Succeed

BECOME CERTIFIED IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Proven Course Catalog & WC Toolbox Give You The Power To Achieve Lower Costs and Better Injured Worker Outcomes

VISIT WORKERS' COMP TRAINING CENTER

Train to Succeed

BECOME CERTIFIED IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Proven Course Catalog & WC Toolbox Give You The Power To Achieve Lower Costs and Better Injured Worker Outcomes

VISIT WORKERS' COMP TRAINING CENTER

Free Download

The 6-Step Process To Determine Workers' Comp Injury Causation - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Previous Post: « Workers Compensation How Safety Meetings Reduce Costs
Next Post: Comply with State Laws When Implementing Drug Screening Programs »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FREE DOWNLOAD

Workers' Comp Claims Review Checklist: 9 Must-Have, Serious-Impact Elements - FREE Download Click Here Now!

FREE DOWNLOAD

The 6-Step Process To Determine Workers' Comp Injury Causation - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Our Sponsors

Catastrophic and Risk Solutions, Case Management Solutions, and Specialty Networks
 

WC Cost-Driver Metrics Suite

Blog Categories

Search Our Archive

Subscribe to Our FREE Newsletter

Return-to-Work Essentials

Footer

Search Our Archive

Search our continually growing archive of over 5,000 articles about Workers' Comp issues.

Quiclinks

  • Calculators
  • Terms & Abbreviations
  • Glossary of WC Premium Terms
  • WC Resources
  • Best Practices
  • Industries
  • Return-to-Work Essentials

RSS Recent Blog Posts

  • Building Partnerships, Not Transactions: The Secret to Better Claims Outcomes
  • Building Your Workers’ Comp Dream Team
  • Your Workers’ Comp Oasis: Why Vision Comes Before Action
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FEE NEWSLETTER
Let Us Help You Stomp Down the High Cost of Workers' Comp!
Top of Page ↑
  • Home
  • Training Center
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Products
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Login
Copyright © 2025 Amaxx, LLC. All Rights Reserved. · Privacy Policy / Legal Notice