They focus on activity instead of impact.
Total incurred losses.
Claim counts.
Lag time averages.
Litigation percentages.
All useful.
But none of those answer the executive question:
“What did this do to our bottom line?”
If you want leadership buy-in, if you want budget approval, if you want workers’ comp viewed as strategic instead of administrative — you must show net cost impact.
Why Total Incurred Isn’t Enough
Imagine this trend over five years:
-
Year 1: $250,000
-
Year 2: $500,000
-
Year 3: $750,000
-
Year 4: $1,000,000
-
Year 5: $750,000
At first glance, this looks chaotic.
Click Link to Access Free PDF Download
Costs doubled.
Then tripled.
Then dropped.
But without context, that data means very little.
What if the workforce grew from 250 employees to 850 employees over that same period?
Now the conversation changes.
Growth alone can increase total incurred losses. So raw totals don’t tell a meaningful story.
That’s why we normalize using cost per FTE (full-time equivalent employee).
But even that isn’t enough for executive decision-makers.
They don’t want ratios.
They want dollars.
The “Cost If We Hadn’t Improved” Concept
This is where net cost impact becomes powerful.
Let’s say your cost per FTE peaked at $1,428 per employee.
Then through better injury management, lag time control, and return-to-work performance, you reduced that to $882 per employee — even as the workforce grew to 850 employees.
Here’s the key question:
What would costs have been if you hadn’t improved?
If you were still paying $1,428 per employee with 850 employees, your total cost would be roughly $1.2 million.
Instead, you paid $750,000.
That’s a difference of approximately $460,000.
That $460,000 is your net cost impact.
Not theoretical.
Not percentage-based.
Actual dollars preserved.
Why This Gets Executive Attention
Unlike revenue growth, which flows through margin percentages, cost reduction in workers’ comp goes directly to net income.
If you generate $460,000 in revenue and your margin is 10%, you keep $46,000.
If you reduce workers’ comp costs by $460,000?
You keep $460,000.
It hits the bottom line at nearly 100%.
That changes the tone of the conversation.
Workers’ comp is no longer:
“A cost of doing business.”
It becomes:
“A controllable contributor to net income.”
That framing changes everything.
Turning Metrics Into Strategy
Once leadership sees net cost impact clearly, buy-in accelerates.
Now the conversation becomes:
-
How did we create that improvement?
-
Which lever did we pull?
-
Can we replicate it?
-
Where else can we apply it?
This is where the cost driver matrix comes back into play.
You move from:
Cost per FTE
→ Frequency vs. Severity
→ Lag time, lost-time rate, litigation, large loss control
But the starting point is always the financial impact.
If you skip that step and dive into operational metrics first, engagement fades quickly.
Budget Follows Impact
When you can demonstrate:
“This initiative preserved $460,000 in net income.”
It becomes far easier to justify:
-
Supervisor training
-
Reporting technology
-
Triage programs
-
Claims coordination improvements
Because the investment conversation becomes rational and measurable.
Without net cost impact, those requests feel optional.
With net cost impact, they feel strategic.
The Shift in Perspective
Workers’ comp leaders often undervalue the work they do.
They improve lag time.
They reduce lost-time claims.
They coordinate better with adjusters.
But if they don’t translate those improvements into bottom-line impact, the value gets discounted.
And that’s unfortunate — because the work is extremely valuable to organizational culture and financial performance.
The key is not just managing claims.
The key is telling the financial story.
FREE DOWNLOAD: “5 Critical Metrics To Measure Workers’ Comp Success”
The Bottom Line
If you want engagement, budget, and executive support:
Start at the top.
Show cost per FTE.
Then show what it means in actual dollars.
Then connect that impact to the levers you pulled.
Net cost impact is the bridge between operations and leadership.
It’s the metric that turns workers’ comp from an expense line into a strategic advantage.
And once that shift happens, everything else becomes easier.
Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.
Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.
Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/
Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/
©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.
FREE DOWNLOAD: “5 Critical Metrics To Measure Workers’ Comp Success”




