Not All Catastrophic Claims Start Catastrophic

When employers think about catastrophic workers’ compensation claims, they usually picture dramatic events—amputations, spinal cord injuries, traumatic brain injuries, or severe burns. These are the claims everyone hopes never happen, and when they do, most organizations accept them as unavoidable.

But here’s the uncomfortable truth: most of the most expensive workers’ comp claims don’t start that way at all.

They start quietly.
They start routinely.
And they often start with injuries we see every single day.

Shoulders. Knees. Hips. Necks. Elbows.

These are not the injuries anyone expects to become six-figure—or even seven-figure—claims. Yet year after year, they are exactly the ones driving the majority of workers’ comp costs.

The Two Types of “Catastrophic” Claims

To understand why this happens, it’s critical to separate true catastrophic claims from what can be called creeping catastrophic claims.

True catastrophic claims are obvious. A major fall. A crushing injury. A severe vehicle accident. Everyone involved immediately recognizes the seriousness, and specialized systems are often activated right away.

Creeping catastrophic claims are different.

They don’t announce themselves.
They don’t look alarming at first.
They blend in with dozens of other “normal” claims.

A shoulder strain.
A knee sprain.
A slip and fall with a bruised hip.

On paper, these injuries should resolve with conservative care and a reasonable return-to-work timeline. And medically speaking, they usually can.

But in many organizations, they don’t.

When Routine Injuries Behave Like Catastrophic Ones

What makes creeping catastrophic claims so dangerous is not the injury itself—it’s what happens after the injury.

Over time, these claims begin to mirror true catastrophic cases in every meaningful way:

• Extended time out of work

• Escalating medical utilization

• Increasing indemnity exposure

• Growing legal complexity

• Profound impact on the injured worker’s life

A shoulder injury that should resolve in weeks stays open for months—or years. A routine knee claim quietly crosses $150,000. An employee who was once fully functional never returns to work.

At that point, the claim behaves like a catastrophic injury, even though it never started as one.

The “Freak Accident” Myth

When employers review these claims years later, there’s a common reaction:

“There was nothing we could have done. That was a freak accident.”

The data says otherwise.

Industry research consistently shows that roughly two-thirds of claims exceeding $1 million begin as routine injuries. They do not start as catastrophic events. They become catastrophic over time due to system failures, missed signals, and unmanaged risk factors.

That means most large-loss claims are not random or unavoidable. They are predictable—and, in many cases, preventable.

Why This Keeps Happening Every Year

If creeping catastrophic claims were truly rare, you would expect them to show up sporadically. Instead, organizations see the same pattern repeat year after year:

• 5–10% of claims driving 70–90% of total costs

• The same injury types appearing again and again

• Similar delays, breakdowns, and disengagement patterns

This consistency matters.

When something happens consistently, it’s not bad luck—it’s a process problem.

The Real Drivers Behind Creeping Catastrophic Claims

So why do routine injuries spiral?

It’s rarely because the medical treatment plan was unclear. Most musculoskeletal injuries have well-established clinical pathways.

The real drivers tend to be non-medical:

• Delayed reporting and lag time

• Poor early communication

• Lack of meaningful return-to-work options

• Low engagement in the claims process

• Psychosocial stressors outside the injury itself

In other words, the injury isn’t the main problem. The system response is.

Why This Distinction Matters

Treating all catastrophic claims as unavoidable disasters leads to resignation. It creates the belief that large losses are simply “the cost of doing business.”

Recognizing creeping catastrophic claims changes everything.

It shifts the conversation from reaction to prevention.
From resignation to control.
From hoping costs go down to actively driving them down.

Most importantly, it creates better outcomes for injured workers—because long-term disability and prolonged absence from work are rarely good for anyone’s health, livelihood, or future.

The Takeaway

The most expensive workers’ comp claims usually don’t start with sirens and emergency rooms. They start with injuries that seem ordinary and manageable.

That’s exactly why they’re so dangerous.

When organizations learn to identify the difference between true catastrophic claims and creeping catastrophic ones, they unlock the opportunity to intervene early, change trajectories, and prevent routine injuries from becoming life-altering events.

And that’s where real cost control—and real human impact—begins.

Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.

Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/

©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.