How Risk Financing Really Works in Workers’ Comp (And Why Structure Matters)

When employers talk about workers’ compensation costs, the conversation often centers on premiums, experience mods, or claim frequency. What’s rarely discussed—but has more impact than any of those metrics—is insurance structure.

Insurance structure determines how much risk an employer retains, how much is transferred, and how much control the organization has over outcomes. To understand this, you have to understand the spectrum of risk financing.

At the lowest end of the spectrum is guaranteed cost insurance. At the highest end is self-insurance. Everything else—retros, captives, and large deductibles—falls somewhere in between.

Guaranteed Cost: Maximum Transfer, Minimum Control

Guaranteed cost is the most familiar structure and the most common, especially for organizations under roughly $100 million in revenue. The employer pays a fixed premium for the policy term. Whether losses are high or low, the premium is locked in for that year.

This structure transfers nearly all risk to the insurance carrier. The tradeoff is predictability. Budgeting is simple. Cash flow is stable.

The downside is control and opportunity. Employers in guaranteed cost programs do not directly participate in underwriting profit. Improvements in claims performance typically show up slowly through future experience mod reductions rather than immediate financial results.

Guaranteed cost is not wrong—it’s just limited.

Moving Up the Spectrum: Retrospective Rating

Retro programs represent the first step toward participating in risk. They often start with a premium that looks similar to guaranteed cost, but the final cost is adjusted after the policy period based on actual loss performance.

These programs introduce guardrails. There is a minimum and maximum premium, creating defined downside risk and upside opportunity. If losses are better than expected, the employer can receive a return premium. If losses deteriorate, costs increase—but only within predefined limits.

This is where employers begin to dip a toe into the business of insurance without taking on unlimited exposure.

Captives: Structured Risk Ownership

Captive insurance represents a significant shift. Employers using captives are no longer just buyers of insurance—they are participants in the insurance mechanism itself.

In a captive arrangement, the employer still purchases coverage from a fronting carrier, but a portion of the premium is retained within a captive entity. Losses up to a certain threshold are paid from that captive layer, while catastrophic losses are transferred through reinsurance.

This structure allows employers to:

• Retain underwriting profit when losses are well managed

• Gain more control over claims handling and vendor selection

• Align operational improvements with immediate financial outcomes

Captives require stronger financials, better predictability, and disciplined claims management. They are not about gambling on risk—they are about earning control.

High Deductibles and Self-Insurance: Maximum Control, Maximum Responsibility

Large deductible programs and self-insurance sit near the top of the spectrum.

With high deductibles, the insurance carrier pays claims initially and the employer reimburses losses up to the deductible. With self-insurance, the employer pays claims directly and is the financial backstop.

These structures offer the highest degree of control and the greatest opportunity for financial return. They also require:

• Strong cash flow

• Collateral or proof of financial strength

• Mature injury management and return-to-work systems

At this level, insurance structure stops being a purchasing decision and becomes a strategic financial decision.

Risk, Reward, and Control Rise Together

As employers move up the spectrum:

• Risk increases

• Reward increases

• Control increases

Organizations that want more control over outcomes must accept more responsibility for results. There is no shortcut.

The key takeaway is simple: insurance structure should never be chosen based on market availability alone. It must align with risk tolerance, predictability, operational discipline, and financial capacity.

Structure is not the solution—but it determines how powerful your solutions can be.

Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.

Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/

©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.