• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • Search
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
 
CHOOSE BROADSPIRE

Amaxx Workers Comp Blog

Reduce Workers Compensation Costs By 20-50%

Header Right

  • Home
    • Training Center
  • Get Started
    • Newcomers Class for WC Professionals
    • Subscribe to Free Newsletter
    • Free Training Center Account
    • Return to Work Resources
    • WC Claims Mgmt. Resources
    • Insurance Advisor Resources
  • Membership
    • Insider (free account)
    • WC Mastery
    • Teams & Managers Mastery
    • Training Partners
  • Products
    • On-Demand Courses
    • Specialty Courses
    • Certifications & Mastery Courses
    • Ultimate Guidebooks
  • Blog
    • Video Blogs
    • COVID-19 / Coronavirus Pandemic
  • Login

Mobile Menu

Choose Broadspire

CHOOSE BROADSPIREBroadspire Delivers Meaningful Results to Our Clients and Their Claimants
  • Home
    • Training Center
  • Get Started
    • Newcomers Class for WC Professionals
    • Subscribe to Free Newsletter
    • Free Training Center Account
    • Return to Work Resources
    • WC Claims Mgmt. Resources
    • Insurance Advisor Resources
  • Membership
    • Insider (free account)
    • WC Mastery
    • Teams & Managers Mastery
    • Training Partners
  • Products
    • On-Demand Courses
    • Specialty Courses
    • Certifications & Mastery Courses
    • Ultimate Guidebooks
  • Blog
    • Video Blogs
    • COVID-19 / Coronavirus Pandemic
  • Login
  • Search
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
You are here: Home / Buyers Guide: Workers Compensation Insurance / Insurance Issues, Rates, Premiums / Early Arrival at Workplace Nixes Workers Comp Claim

Early Arrival at Workplace Nixes Workers Comp Claim

January 4, 2010 By //  by Thomas Robinson, J.D. Leave a Comment

How Would You Decide:  Ohio Worker’s Arrival at Work Site More than One and One-Half Hours Early Might Nix His Comp Claim for Injuries Arising From Assault

Here’s What Happened

Buck was employed  by Melco as a heavy equipment machine operator.  He was assigned to do excavation at a quarry located approximately seventy miles from his home in Toledo, Ohio.  He customarily left his home early to ensure that he arrived to the site on time for his work shift which began at 7:00 a.m. each workday.   

However,  it was customary for the employees to enter to the quarry at 6:30 a.m., when the foreman arrived, to start the machines, and to be ready to perform promptly at 7:00 a.m.  On the day in question, Buck arrived at 5:30 a.m., parking his truck near the gate where he and others had been instructed.  Between 5:45 a.m. and 6:00 a.m., he exited the vehicle to use a “port-a-john” located adjacent to the designated parking area.  As Buck left the port-a-john to return to his vehicle, he was accosted by three men who beat and robbed him.  Some ten minutes after the assault, other employees arrived and offered assistance.  The foreman arrived at approximately 6:30 a.m. and law enforcement officers were notified. 

Buck was admitted  to a county hospital for treatment of his injuries and subsequently sought workers’ compensation benefits.  Both the district hearing officer and the staff hearing officer for the Industrial Commission allowed the claim, concluding that the injury occurred in the course of and arose out of Buck’s employment.  Melco appealed to the Industrial Commission, which refused to consider further appeal.  Melco then appealed to the County Court of Common Pleas pursuant to Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 4123.512. The parties entered a stipulation of facts and indicated the only issue on appeal before the trial court was whether Buck’s injury occurred within the course of and arising out of his employment with Melco.

The trial court   granted Buck’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the injury was compensable and it denied Melco’s similar motion.  Melco appealed, contending in relevant part that at the time of the assault Buck was not engaged in an activity required by his employment, that Buck’s actions did not serve any benefit to Melco because the injury occurred more than an hour prior to the scheduled commencement of Buck’s workday.

Here’s What The Court Decided:

In Buck v. Melco, Inc., 2009 Ohio 6872, 2009 Ohio App.   LEXIS 5766 (Dec. 28, 2009), the Court of Appeal of Ohio (Third Appellate Dist.) reversed the entry of summary judgment, finding that there were a number of genuine issues of material fact that remained unanswered in the record.  The court indicated Buck’s early arrival might have placed him outside the course of his employment with Melco.  The appellate court stressed that while the parties had stipulated that it was “customary” for the employees to arrive at least thirty minutes prior to their shift, it was unclear whether some employees were “encouraged” or “expected” by Melco to arrive early and perform preparatory activities, or whether the practice of early arrival was purely voluntary for the convenience or benefit of the employees, as opposed to the convenience or benefit of Melco.  The court added that Buck’s “customary” early arrival at the jobsite, standing alone, was an insufficient basis for a determination, as a matter of law, that Buck was “within the course of” his employment at the time of the assault. 

According to   the court, a more complete resolution of the factual circumstances surrounding the employees’ early arrivals was essential in determining whether the timing of Buck’s arrival at the jobsite was consistent with his contract for hire, logically related to his employment with Melco and, thus, whether Buck was indeed in the course of his employment when his injury occurred.  The court also indicated that similarly, the issue of Buck’s early arrival to the jobsite also raised issues of material fact with regard to the “arising out of” portion of the court’s analysis.   (workersxzcompxzkit)

On the one hand,  ensuring that an employee arrived on time benefited the employer-having an employee readily available when the foreman arrived was important.  On the other hand, a question naturally arose as to whether, under the totality of circumstances and employer expectations, an employee’s presence a full one and a half hours before the formal 7:00 a.m. start time still fell within the “benefit the employer received” language described in the important Ohio case, Lord v. Daugherty, 66 Ohio St. 2d 441, 423 N.E.2d 96 (1981).  Based on the factual issues, summary judgment was not appropriate. See generally Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law, § 8.01, 8.03, 12.01, 13.04.

Tom Robinson, J.D. is the primary  upkeep writer for Larson’s Workers’ Compensation Law (LexisNexis) and Larson’s Workers’ Compensation, Desk Edition (LexisNexis). He is a contributing writer for California Compensation Cases (LexisNexis) and Benefits Review Board – Longshore Reporter(LexisNexis), and is a contributing author to New York Workers’ Compensation Handbook(LexisNexis). Robinson is an authority in the area of workers’ compensation and we are happy to have him as a Guest Contributor to Workers’ Comp Kit Blog. Tom can be reached at: compwriter@gmail.com

. 

 

http://law.lexisnexis.com/practiceareas/Workers-Compensation
Podcast/Webcast: How To Prevent Fraudulent Workers’ Compensation Claims
http://www.workerscompkit.com/gallagher/podcast/Fraudulent_Workers_Compensation_Claims/index.php

WC Books: http://www.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/workers-comp-books-manuals.php
TD Calculator: www.ReduceYourWorkersComp.com/transitional-duty-cost-calculator.php
WC Calculator:
http://www.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/calculator.php
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers’ comp issues.

©2009 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@WorkersCompKit.com

Filed Under: Insurance Issues, Rates, Premiums Tagged With: Course and Scope of Employment

Related Articles

Experience Modification Method To Calculate Workers Comp Premium

Experience Modification Method To Calculate Workers Comp Premium

Correctly Calculate the Average Weekly Wage

Correctly Calculate the Average Weekly Wage

Independent Contractors in Workers’ Compensation: When Are They Really An Employee?

Independent Contractors in Workers’ Compensation: When Are They Really An Employee?

Understanding the HIGH Cost of Selecting the LOW Price Work Comp Proposal

Understanding the HIGH Cost of Selecting the LOW Price Work Comp Proposal

Know Your Correct Job Classification Codes To Save Workers’ Comp Costs

Know Your Correct Job Classification Codes To Save Workers’ Comp Costs

Six Tips to Get the Most From Your Insurer

Six Tips to Get the Most From Your Insurer

The 8 Sections of Your Workers Compensation Insurance Policy

The 8 Sections of Your Workers Compensation Insurance Policy
6 Common Mistakes Made In A Workers’ Comp Premium Audit

6 Common Mistakes Made In A Workers’ Comp Premium Audit

6 Common Mistakes Made In A Workers’ Comp Premium Audit

Waivers of Statutory Immunity Impact on Workers Compensation

Waivers of Statutory Immunity Impact on Workers Compensation

Workers Compensation Insurance Premium Audits

Workers Compensation Insurance Premium Audits

Dollars and Cents of Frequency And Severity Work Comp Premium Impact

Dollars and Cents of Frequency And Severity Work Comp Premium Impact

5 Methods to Calculate Workers Comp Premiums

5 Methods to Calculate Workers Comp Premiums

Free Download

Workers' Comp Claims Review Checklist: 9 Must-Have, Serious-Impact Elements - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Train to Succeed

BECOME CERTIFIED IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Proven Course Catalog & WC Toolbox Give You The Power To Achieve Lower Costs and Better Injured Worker Outcomes

VISIT WORKERS' COMP TRAINING CENTER

Previous Post: « Find Out Four Keys to Workers Comp Cost Reduction 79 Percent
Next Post: U.K. Fireworks Factory Owner Guilty of Manslaughter in Death of Firemen »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FREE DOWNLOAD

Workers' Comp Claims Review Checklist: 9 Must-Have, Serious-Impact Elements - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Our Sponsors

Broadspire

Workers’ Comp 3rd-Party Administrator
 

Catastrophic Care Management, Complex Care, and Specialty Networks
 

Ametros

Post-Settlement Administration
 

Medicare Secondary Payer Services
 

Medcor

Injury Triage, Onsite Clinics

Read Our Award-Winning Blog

Blog Categories

Search Our Archive

Subscribe to Our FREE Newsletter

Footer

Search Our Archive

Search our continually growing archive of over 2500 articles about Workers' Comp issues.

Quiclinks

  • Calculators
  • Terms & Abbreviations
  • Glossary of WC Premium Terms
  • WC Resources
  • Best Practices
  • Industries

RSS Recent Blog Posts

  • Implement These Safety Training Guidelines
  • Small Communication Improvements Lead to Large Workers’ Comp Savings
  • Identify And Correct Workers’ Comp Litigation Drivers
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FEE NEWSLETTER
Let Us Help You Stomp Down the High Cost of Workers' Comp!
Top of Page ↑
  • Home
  • Training Center
  • Get Started
  • Membership
  • Products
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Login
Copyright © 2021 Amaxx, LLC. All Rights Reserved. · Privacy Policy / Legal Notice