Now look at what most of those meetings produce. A status update on each claim. A reserve that moved. The next appointment date. Then everyone hangs up, and the following week the same kinds of injuries come in the same way.
Why it is a myth
A claim review looks backward, at claims that already exist. Control is about what happens on the next injury, before it ever becomes a claim. A review that only reports status is a reporting meeting. It tells you where things stand. It does not change what any supervisor does tomorrow morning.
The test is short: a review only counts if something changes. If you cannot name the decision your last review produced, who owns it and when it is due, the meeting was an update, not control.
Run your next review against this checklist
“Workers’ Comp Claims Review Checklist: 9 Must Have, Serious Impact Elements”
What to look at instead
Take your last three reviews and ask:
- Did any claim come up because of how it started, not just where it stands? A late report, no call on the first day, no transitional duty offer.
- Did the meeting produce a change outside the claim file, to a supervisor, a location or a process?
- Does that change have an owner and a date, and did anyone check whether it happened?
- Are the same locations showing up again?
If most of the answers are no, your reviews are doing what they were built to do, which is keep the claims moving. They were never built to keep the program under control. That takes a short weekly look at how every new injury was handled at the front end, with the misses assigned and followed up. It is also why reviewing claims only once a quarter leaves so much unseen.
Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com
©2008–2026 Amaxx LLC. All Rights Reserved under International Copyright Law
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.




What Is Transitional Duty?