The Hidden Costs of Discount-Driven Medical Networks

At first glance, “discount” sounds like a good deal. Every employer wants to believe that a 30% or 40% reduction in medical costs means their workers’ compensation program is saving money. But when it comes to medical networks, those discounts often create an illusion of savings that can quietly drain the program from within.

For decades, network arrangements have been sold on the promise of access and affordability. TPAs, carriers, and managed-care organizations compete for clients by showing impressive markdowns off the state fee schedule. What looks good in a marketing brochure doesn’t always look good on your loss run.

The Business Behind the “Discount”

Here’s how it really works.
A third-party administrator or network vendor approaches a provider or clinic with a proposal: “Give us a 30% discount, and we’ll send you more patients.” On paper, everyone wins. The employer thinks they’re saving money, the provider expects a surge in referrals, and the TPA takes credit for delivering a “cost-containment solution.”

But the volume rarely matches the promise. The provider’s reimbursements drop immediately, yet the patient flow doesn’t rise enough to offset the cut. Inevitably, the provider looks for ways to make up the lost revenue — more office visits, longer treatment plans, higher billing codes, or referrals for unnecessary diagnostics. The network discount remains on the spreadsheet, but the real costs begin to rise.

The Illusion of Savings

The problem isn’t just over-treatment; it’s the way performance is measured. Employers often focus on unit price — the “discount” — rather than total outcome cost.

Ask yourself:
Would you rather pay $100 for three visits or $70 for ten?
When viewed through the full life of a claim, that “cheaper” $70 visit can quickly cost you far more.

This is the heart of the discount illusion: savings on paper that evaporate once you consider claim duration, indemnity exposure, or the number of procedures billed.

Why Deep Discounts Drive Poor Behavior

Discount-driven models create misaligned incentives. Providers are pushed to work faster for less money. TPAs are rewarded for steering volume, not outcomes. The result is a fragmented system where each party tries to protect its margin rather than the injured worker’s recovery.

When employers don’t understand how those incentives work, they lose control over quality. The patient’s experience suffers, trust declines, and the likelihood of litigation rises. In short, chasing discounts can undermine every other piece of your cost-control strategy.

The Employer’s Way Out: Intentional Relationships

Employers can reclaim control by re-evaluating how their networks are built and how providers are selected. Begin by asking hard questions:

• Who controls the network relationship? Is it your TPA, or do you have input?

• How are providers incentivized? Are they measured by return-to-work outcomes or by visit counts?

• What data do you receive? Can you compare provider performance beyond just price?

Forward-thinking employers are building direct, performance-based relationships with their medical partners. They negotiate not only on price but on expectations — early communication, timely reporting, and commitment to modified duty. They focus on what truly drives cost: faster recovery, fewer lost days, and improved satisfaction.

From Discounts to Partnerships

When you remove the middle layers and connect directly with trusted occupational physicians, the entire dynamic changes. Providers no longer need to “game” the system to stay afloat. They’re fairly compensated for high-quality care, and they’re motivated to collaborate because the employer values outcomes over volume.

The result?
Shorter claim durations, fewer disputes, and better morale among injured employees who feel genuinely cared for.

The Bottom Line

The phrase “cheaper isn’t always better” has never been truer than in workers’ compensation medical networks. The biggest discount may not be the best deal — and can, in fact, become the costliest mistake.

Employers who focus on trust, transparency, and true outcomes end up with programs that cost less, perform better, and build stronger relationships across the board. The next time a vendor boasts about a 30% discount, ask instead: “What are your return-to-work results?” That’s where the real savings lie.

Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.

Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

Workers’ Comp Roundup Blog: http://blog.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/

Injury Management Results (IMR) Software: https://imrsoftware.com/

©2025 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.