On-Site vs. Outpatient vs. In-Home: Choosing the Right Setting for Physical Therapy
When an employee is injured at work, the road to recovery doesn’t end with surgery or medical treatment. For most workers’ comp claims, physical therapy (PT) plays a critical role in restoring function, reducing pain, and helping employees safely return to work.
But not all physical therapy is delivered in the same way. Employers, claims managers, and injured workers are often faced with a crucial decision: Should therapy take place at an outpatient facility, in an inpatient unit, or even right at home or on-site at the workplace?
Each setting has unique advantages and limitations. Choosing the right one can dramatically impact not only recovery outcomes but also overall claim costs.
Why Physical Therapy Matters in Workers’ Comp
Before diving into settings, it’s worth remembering why PT is so essential in workers’ comp claims:
It speeds healing after injuries and surgeries.
It restores range of motion and strength.
It reduces the risk of long-term disability.
It provides measurable progress toward recovery goals.
It supports a safe and timely return to work.
With therapy being such a cornerstone of recovery, the setting in which it takes place can either accelerate progress or slow it down.
Outpatient Physical Therapy: The Standard Approach
Outpatient PT clinics—whether hospital-based or freestanding facilities—are the most common setting for injured employees. Workers visit the clinic several times per week, receive treatment, and return home.
Advantages:
Wide Range of Services: Outpatient clinics offer access to advanced equipment and modalities such as hydrotherapy, ultrasound, and electrical stimulation.
Specialized Therapists: Clinics often have staff with experience in occupational injuries, orthopedic conditions, or post-surgical recovery.
Structured Progression: Regular, scheduled visits provide consistency and measurable progress.
Challenges:
Transportation Barriers: Injured employees may struggle to travel, especially if mobility is limited or if the clinic is far away.
Time Off Work: Multiple weekly appointments can cut into work hours or prolong modified duty schedules.
Higher Costs: For employers and insurers, frequent outpatient sessions add up quickly, especially if utilization isn’t well managed.
Outpatient therapy works best for injuries requiring specialized equipment and when the employee has reliable transportation.
Inpatient Rehabilitation Units: For Complex Cases
Inpatient rehab units are typically used for employees with serious, complex, or multiple injuries, or those immediately following surgery. In this setting, the injured worker lives at the facility for a period of time and receives care from a multidisciplinary team that may include physical therapists, occupational therapists, rehabilitation nurses, psychologists, and even speech or respiratory therapists.
Advantages:
Intensive, Multidisciplinary Care: Ideal for workers with traumatic injuries, such as spinal cord damage or multiple fractures.
Continuous Monitoring: Provides around-the-clock oversight, ensuring faster responses to complications or setbacks.
Smooth Transition to Outpatient: Inpatient programs often lead directly into outpatient therapy, creating continuity of care.
Challenges:
High Cost: Inpatient rehab is the most expensive option and should be reserved for severe cases.
Extended Time Away from Work: Employees may be out of the workplace for weeks or months.
Limited Applicability: Most workers’ comp cases don’t require inpatient rehab.
This setting is best for catastrophic injuries where comprehensive, round-the-clock rehabilitation is necessary to maximize recovery potential.
On-Site Therapy: The Employer Advantage
Some employers with large workforces and higher injury rates invest in on-site PT services. This might be through a company medical clinic or by contracting a physical therapist to come to the workplace.
Advantages:
Immediate Access to Care: Injured employees don’t have to wait for external appointments—they can receive therapy right at work.
Faster Return to Duty: On-site therapy can be closely integrated with transitional or modified duty programs.
Lower Long-Term Costs: While upfront investment is higher, on-site care often reduces overall medical and indemnity costs by preventing extended lost time.
Cost to Establish: Employers must have the scale and resources to support on-site staff and equipment.
Not Always Practical: Smaller companies won’t see enough cases to justify the expense.
Limited Services: On-site clinics may not have the same advanced equipment as outpatient centers.
On-site therapy works best for large employers, particularly in industries like manufacturing, construction, or warehousing, where musculoskeletal injuries are common.
In-Home Therapy: Bringing Recovery to the Worker
For some employees, especially those with mobility issues, in-home PT may be the most practical solution. Therapists visit the worker’s home to deliver treatment.
Comfort: Therapy happens in the worker’s own environment, which may increase compliance.
Safe Transition to Independence: Therapists can assess how the worker functions in their home and provide tailored recommendations.
Challenges:
Limited Equipment: Home-based therapy relies on portable tools and exercises, which may not be as comprehensive as a clinic’s resources.
Higher Per-Visit Costs: Travel time for therapists can make sessions more expensive.
Potential for Slower Progress: Without access to advanced modalities, recovery may take longer.
In-home therapy is best for workers with severe mobility restrictions or those in early recovery stages after surgery.
How to Choose the Right Setting
Selecting the right PT setting should be a collaborative decision involving the treating physician, therapist, claims adjuster, and employer. Key considerations include:
Nature and Severity of the Injury: Catastrophic injuries may require inpatient rehab, while routine sprains or fractures may be best served outpatient.
Employee’s Mobility and Access to Transportation: If travel is difficult, in-home or on-site options may be preferable.
Cost vs. Benefit: Employers must weigh the cost of each setting against the potential savings in faster recovery and reduced claim duration.
Integration with Return-to-Work Programs: The closer therapy is tied to modified duty, the better the outcomes.
The best outcomes happen when therapy settings are matched to the worker’s needs, the employer’s resources, and the overall return-to-work strategy.
For employers who want to lower costs, speed recovery, and show genuine care for their injured employees, making smart decisions about where therapy happens is just as important as the therapy itself.
Michael Stack, CEO of Amaxx LLC, is an expert in workers’ compensation cost containment systems and provides education, training, and consulting to help employers reduce their workers’ compensation costs by 20% to 50%. He is co-author of the #1 selling comprehensive training guide “Your Ultimate Guide to Mastering Workers’ Comp Costs: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%.” Stack is the creator of Injury Management Results (IMR) software and founder of Amaxx Workers’ Comp Training Center. WC Mastery Training teaching injury management best practices such as return to work, communication, claims best practices, medical management, and working with vendors. IMR software simplifies the implementation of these best practices for employers and ties results to a Critical Metrics Dashboard.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.