• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
 

Amaxx Workers Comp Blog

Reduce Workers Compensation Costs By 20-50%

Header Right

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help
  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Medical Cost Containment / Use Medical Expertise To Control Employee Fraud

Use Medical Expertise To Control Employee Fraud

February 23, 2016 By //  by Michael B. Stack 1 Comment

While most medical providers are honest and operate with high integrity, it is important to recognize that medical providers have ability and power to commit and aid employees in commission of workers’ compensation fraud. The more the provider sees or treats the employee, the more can be billed.

 

While not actually being provable as fraud, medical providers may require unnecessary testing and treatment in order to protect themselves against mal-practice claims.

 

Incidents that may suggest fraud or collusion between Doctor and Employee:

 

  1. Billing under wrong treatment codes.
  2. Billing for visits that never occurred.
  3. Extending disabilities beyond normally expected recovery periods.
  4. Setting permanency ratings that are above normal expectations.
  5. Bringing in latent symptomology or non-related symptomology.
  6. Claiming aggravated pre-existing conditions.
  7. Charging for a treatment that was higher than the one preformed.
  8. Recommending care, prosthetics, medical equipment, or treatment that might not be needed.
  9. Presenting vague or guarded diagnosis that does not fit facts as to how the loss occurred.
  10. Weak explanations as to causally related treatment.
  11. The medical provider has close associations with plaintiff counsel.

 

Adjuster Challenges:

 

Adjusters, like the public at large, hold the medical providers in high esteem. It is easy for an adjuster to blindly believe that the medical provider knows best. Even if adjusters do suspect problems they may be easily intimidated when trying to challenge the medical provider. It is tough to challenge when the playing fields are so separated.

 

To compound the problem, most medical reports are now coded by number, making it more challenging for an adjuster to know what the numbers represent.

 

States that have medical fee schedules and treatment standards often can be manipulated so that a higher paying code could apply. Most adjusters cannot be expected to have the medical expertise and training to pick up on these subtleties.

 

 

 

Medical Management:

 

All claim units need one claim technician, or a medical advisor with a strong knowledge of basic traumatic injury and occupational disease exposures. This includes knowledge of normal treatment procedures, normal expected disabilities, and possible underlying pathologies that may be aggravated. Training in state medical fee and procedure schedules is mandatory.

 

The medical expert should be able to determine if the injury or disease is causally related to the employment. Handling technicians need to assist the medical expert by taking statements and gathering detailed factual evidence describing exactly how the loss occurred.

 

The medical expert needs to keep current on new medical procedures, changes in fee and treatment law. If the claim unit cannot have an in house medical expert all cases should be referred to a medical management organization.

 

Such an individual is on a closer level of knowledge to the medical provider. Medical providers should be more receptive to a call from another medical expert.

 

On discovery of an issue or problem, direct contact with the medical provider is made. If resolution does not occur, the medical expert with the handling adjuster should immediately move for Independent Medical Evaluation, Utilization Review, and/or contact Defense Counsel for the next appropriate step.

 

Seriously injured employees should be placed under medical management. Employees with more than 12 weeks of lost time due to injury or disease should be reviewed for medical management.

 

 

Author Michael Stack, Principal, COMPClub, Amaxx LLC. He is an expert in workers compensation cost containment systems and helps employers reduce their work comp costs by 20% to 50%. He works as a consultant to large and mid-market clients, is co-author of Your Ultimate Guide To Mastering Workers Comp Costs, a comprehensive step-by-step manual of cost containment strategies based on hands-on field experience, and is founder of COMPClub, an exclusive member training program on workers compensation cost containment best practices. Through these platforms he is in the trenches on a working together with clients to implement and define best practices, which allows him to continuously be at the forefront of innovation and thought leadership in workers’ compensation cost containment. Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

 

23

©2016 Amaxx LLC. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

 

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.

 

Filed Under: Medical Cost Containment

Related Articles

The Three C’s of a Great Medical Provider Relationship — Care, Cooperation, and Credentials

The Three C’s of a Great Medical Provider Relationship — Care, Cooperation, and Credentials

The Hidden Costs of Discount-Driven Medical Networks

The Hidden Costs of Discount-Driven Medical Networks

Why Early Vocational Rehab Can Prevent Long-Term Disability Claims

Why Early Vocational Rehab Can Prevent Long-Term Disability Claims

On-Site vs. Outpatient vs. In-Home: Choosing the Right Setting for Physical Therapy

On-Site vs. Outpatient vs. In-Home: Choosing the Right Setting for Physical Therapy

Teaching Injured Workers How to Work (and Live) Again

Teaching Injured Workers How to Work (and Live) Again

Chronic Pain Programs: A Smarter Approach for Aging Workforces

Chronic Pain Programs: A Smarter Approach for Aging Workforces

Behind the Scenes of Medical Bill Review: How to Catch Overcharges and Coding Errors

Behind the Scenes of Medical Bill Review: How to Catch Overcharges and Coding Errors

Injury Triage: The $100 Decision That Can Save Thousands

Injury Triage: The $100 Decision That Can Save Thousands

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) in Workers’ Comp: A Case Study on Partial Rotator Cuff Tear

Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) in Workers’ Comp: A Case Study on Partial Rotator Cuff Tear

What is Evidence-Based Medicine in Workers’ Compensation

What is Evidence-Based Medicine in Workers’ Compensation

The Role of Evidence-Based Medicine in Transforming Workers’ Compensation

The Role of Evidence-Based Medicine in Transforming Workers’ Compensation

Part 2 of 2: When Not to Use Nurse Case Management in Workers’ Compensation

Part 2 of 2: When Not to Use Nurse Case Management in Workers’ Compensation

Train to Succeed

BECOME CERTIFIED IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Proven Course Catalog & WC Toolbox Give You The Power To Achieve Lower Costs and Better Injured Worker Outcomes

VISIT WORKERS' COMP TRAINING CENTER

Free Download

The 6-Step Process To Determine Workers' Comp Injury Causation - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Previous Post: « Manitoba WCB Looks for Inclusion in Workplace, Less Injuries
Next Post: CHSWC Notes Appointment of Wei »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Herbert Hill

    February 24, 2016 at 3:01 pm

    There are always challenges with this, great thoughts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FREE DOWNLOAD

The 6-Step Process To Determine Workers' Comp Injury Causation - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Our Sponsors

Catastrophic and Risk Solutions, Case Management Solutions, and Specialty Networks
 

WC Cost-Driver Metrics Suite

Blog Categories

Search Our Archive

Subscribe to Our FREE Newsletter

Return-to-Work Essentials

Footer

Search Our Archive

Search our continually growing archive of over 5,000 articles about Workers' Comp issues.

Quiclinks

  • Calculators
  • Terms & Abbreviations
  • Glossary of WC Premium Terms
  • WC Resources
  • Best Practices
  • Industries
  • Return-to-Work Essentials

RSS Recent Blog Posts

  • Think You’re Too Big to Worry About Frequency? Think Again
  • Can a High Deductible Plan Help Lower Your Mod?
  • The 70% Discount You Might Be Missing in Workers’ Comp
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FEE NEWSLETTER
Let Us Help You Stomp Down the High Cost of Workers' Comp!
Top of Page ↑
  • Home
  • Training Center
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Products
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Login
Copyright © 2025 Amaxx, LLC. All Rights Reserved. · Privacy Policy / Legal Notice