Understand “Arising out of AND In the Course of” Concepts

In order for a work injury to be compensable, it must first “arise out of” and take place “in the course of” the employee’s employment.  While case law interpretations vary in each jurisdiction, understanding these principles is key to evaluating a claim.

 

 

When Does an Injury “Arise Out Of” Employment?

 

The first element of compensability is probably an area of workers’ compensation law that has led to the greatest split in interpretations across the United States and the 51 various workers’ compensation programs.  This is based on the fact this component examines the causation and its relation to the “risk” related to the employee’s employment.

 

While it may seem to be clear-cut when an injury “arises out of” one’s employment, courts have continually struggled with this issue since the inception of workers’ compensation programs.  In some instances, courts will only allow a workplace injury to be compensable if there is an “increased” or “heightened” risk created by the employment.  For example, if a bullet fired from an adjacent building during work hours strikes an auto mechanic, the resulting injury could be determined to be not compensable based on the fact that the employment did not make the employee more likely to be injured from the accidental discharge of a gun.  On the other hand, this same injury could be compensable if the employee worked at a gun range.

 

 

The Meaning of “In the Course of”

 

When addressing issues of compensability, it is also important to examine whether the injury was in the “course of” employment.  As a general rule, courts examine this component in terms of the “time and place” of employment.  While this may seem to be straightforward, the complexities of the work environment continually raise questions.  These questions typically arise the following work scenarios:

 

  1. Meals and work breaks;
  2. Ingress/egress from the place of employment;
  3. The home workplace/telecommuting;
  4. Traveling employees;
  5. Horseplay and Prohibited Acts;
  6. Personal Comfort Doctrine; and
  7. The list is endless…

 

In investigating claims, it is important for claim management teams to understand what the employee was doing at the time the injury occurred and if the conduct took the employee “outside” their employment.

 

For example, injuries that take place while doing an errand or activity at the employer’s request or the furtherance of their interests will generally be compensable.  This could include an employee running to the office supply store to get copier toner or paper because they have run out.  On the other hand, it generally would not be compensable if the same employee were running the same errand during a break to get the same supplies for their personal needs.

 

Traveling employees also create litigation with activities they perform on their down time.  While the general rule typically provides “portal-to-portal” coverage under workers’ compensation for these employees, litigation arises when the injury occurs during “personal deviations” or acts that may be prohibited under company policy.

 

 

Tips for Claims Investigation on Threshold Issues

 

Effective claim management professionals should always examine the threshold issue of whether the injury “arose out of” and was “in the course of” the employee’s employment.  When investigating these matters, you should be careful to examine the circumstances and nature of every work injury.

 

  1. Where did it take place?
  2. What were the conditions of the surface the employee accident scene?
  3. What was the employee doing prior to the injury?
  4. Who instructed the employee to engage in the activity that led to the injury?
  5. Were there any company policies that governed the employee’s conduct?
  6. Why was the employee engaging in an activity?

 

It is also important to know that law of the jurisdiction you are working in and have a basic understand of how to apply the facts of your case to the law.

 

 

Author Michael Stack, Principal of Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. He is an expert in employer communication systems and helps employers reduce their workers comp costs by 20% to 50%. He resides in the Boston area and works as a Qualified Loss Management Program provider working with high experience modification factor companies in the Massachusetts State Risk Pool.  As the senior editor of Amaxx’s publishing division, Michael is on the cutting edge of innovation and thought leadership in workers compensation cost containment. http://reduceyourworkerscomp.com/about/.  Contact: mstack@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.

 

©2014 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

 

SALES TO PAY FOR ACCIDENTS CALCULATOR:  http://reduceyourworkerscomp.com/sales-to-pay-for-accidents-calculator/

MODIFIED DUTY CALCULATOR:   http://reduceyourworkerscomp.com/transitional-duty-cost-calculators/

WC GROUP:  http://www.linkedin.com/groups?homeNewMember=&gid=1922050/

SUBSCRIBE: Workers Comp Resource Center Newsletter

 

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker, attorney, or qualified professional.

 

 

Speak Your Mind

*

Professional Development Resource

Learn How to Reduce Workers Comp Costs 20% to 50%"Workers Compensation Management Program: Reduce Costs 20% to 50%"
Lower your workers compensation expense by using the
guidebook from Advisen and the Workers Comp Resource Center.
Perfect for promotional distribution by brokers and agents!
Learn More

Please don't print this Website

Unnecessary printing not only means unnecessary cost of paper and inks, but also avoidable environmental impact on producing and shipping these supplies. Reducing printing can make a small but a significant impact.

Instead use the PDF download option, provided on the page you tried to print.

Powered by "Unprintable Blog" for Wordpress - www.greencp.de