• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
 
ARCADIA: Stronger Settlement Partnerships. Innovative Solutions.

Amaxx Workers Comp Blog

Reduce Workers Compensation Costs By 20-50%

Header Right

  • Home
    • Training Center
  • Search
    • Free Resources & Solutions
    • Subscribe to Free Newsletter
    • Create Free Training Center Account
    • Enroll in On-Demand Courses
    • Activate WC Mastery Membership
    • Request Strategic Coaching Session
    • Buy WC Guidebooks
  • Membership
    • Insider (free account)
    • WC Mastery
    • Teams & Managers Mastery
    • Training Partners
  • Products
    • On-Demand Courses
    • Specialty Courses
    • Certifications & Mastery Courses
    • Ultimate Guidebooks
    • Coaching
  • Blog
    • Video Blogs
    • COVID-19 / Coronavirus Pandemic
  • Login

Mobile Menu

  • Home
    • Training Center
  • Search
    • Free Resources & Solutions
    • Subscribe to Free Newsletter
    • Create Free Training Center Account
    • Enroll in On-Demand Courses
    • Activate WC Mastery Membership
    • Request Strategic Coaching Session
    • Buy WC Guidebooks
  • Membership
    • Insider (free account)
    • WC Mastery
    • Teams & Managers Mastery
    • Training Partners
  • Products
    • On-Demand Courses
    • Specialty Courses
    • Certifications & Mastery Courses
    • Ultimate Guidebooks
    • Coaching
  • Blog
    • Video Blogs
    • COVID-19 / Coronavirus Pandemic
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
You are here: Home / Benchmarking & FTE & Operational Comparison / WCRI Michigan Cost Per Claim Among Lowest

WCRI Michigan Cost Per Claim Among Lowest

June 7, 2011 By //  by Robert Elliott, J.D. Leave a Comment

Workers compensation total costs per claim in Michigan increased at a slower rate than in other study states that did not have major reforms of the workers comp system during the study period, according to a report by the Workers Compensation Research Institute (WCRI).
 
 
WCRI discovered that total costs per claim in Michigan increased 28 percent between 2003 and 2008, or 5 percent per year on average. While this growth rate was only a bit more modest than the growth in the median of 16 study states, the overall growth rate in Michigan was slowest among the non-reform states. (WCxKit)
 
 
In the early years covered by this study, this result was likely due to modest growth in indemnity costs per claim. Indemnity costs in Michigan grew by 1.5 percent between 2003 and 2007, slower than the median rate of growth of 3.6 percent.
 
 
The study, CompScope™ Benchmarks for Michigan, 11th Edition, reported that the moderate growth in indemnity benefits between 2003 and 2008 was the result of small increases in the average weekly wage and slight gains in the duration of temporary disability.
 
 
The total costs per claim in Michigan were among the lowest of the study states. At close to $4,900 per case, the average cost per claim was 36 percent less than the median study state.
 
 
This result may be driven by lower medical costs per claim in Michigan. The average medical cost per claim of just under $9,200 among claims with more than seven days of lost time was one of the lowest of the study states – 28 percent lower than the 16-state median.
 
 
Indemnity costs per claim with more than seven days of lost time were 7 percent lower than in the median study state. This result was driven by shorter duration of temporary disability than the other wage-loss systems and a lower average weekly temporary total disability (TTD) benefit rate. States with a wage-loss benefit structure generally have a longer duration of temporary disability, due to the fact most indemnity benefits are paid as temporary disability benefits.
 
 
At an average of 18 weeks, duration of temporary disability in Michigan was shorter than in other wage-loss study states – 6 to 8 weeks shorter than Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, 15 weeks shorter than Louisiana.
 
 
Several system features and processes in Michigan, including processes for terminating TTD benefits, might contribute to the shorter duration. 
 
 
Another factor underlying relatively lower indemnity benefits per claim in Michigan was a slightly lower average weekly TTD benefit rate. This was related to the statutory benefit structure in Michigan.
 
 
The Michigan benefit structure is different from the benefit structure in most states in two ways. First, Michigan bases weekly benefits on 80 percent of after-tax (spendable) earnings, whereas most states pay two-thirds of the worker’s pre-tax average weekly wage. Second, Michigan sets the maximum statutory weekly benefit at 90 percent of the statewide average weekly wage, while most states set the maximum benefit at 100 percent, or higher.
 
 
Under the Michigan benefit structure, 18 percent of workers (those with lower wages) received higher weekly benefits than under the typical structure, but more than one third of workers (those with higher wages) received at least 5 percent less.
 
 
The study also notes that injury reporting time in Michigan improved steadily over the study period. The percentage of claims reported to payers within 3 days of injury grew by approximately 8 percentage points from 2003 to 2008. (WCxKit)
 
 
This factor contributed to steady improvements in the speed to the first indemnity payment. However, the study notes Michigan still has potential for improvement, due to the fact injured workers obtained their first indemnity payment slower than in the typical study state.
 
 
Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact:Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com or 860-553-6604.
 
 
WC IQ TEST:  http://www.workerscompkit.com/intro/
WORK COMP CALCULATOR: http://www.LowerWC.com/calculator.php
MODIFIED DUTY CALCULATOR:  http://www.LowerWC.com/transitional-duty-cost-calculator.php
WC GROUP: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?homeNewMember=&gid=1922050/
SUBSCRIBE: Workers Comp Resource Center Newsletter
 
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
 
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com

Filed Under: Benchmarking & FTE & Operational Comparison Tagged With: Benchmarking, cost per claim, Michigan Workers Comp Law, WCRI

Related Articles

OSHA Records are Due March 2nd

OSHA Records are Due March 2nd

How Do You Know If You Are Winning in Workers’ Comp Management?

How Do You Know If You Are Winning in Workers’ Comp Management?

How to Calculate Cost Per FTE Metric to Show Workers’ Comp As Profit Center

How to Calculate Cost Per FTE Metric to Show Workers’ Comp As Profit Center

Improve Workers’ Comp Lag Time With This Single Principle

Improve Workers’ Comp Lag Time With This Single Principle

Be Prepared to Deliver Your Workers’ Comp State of the Union Address

Be Prepared to Deliver Your Workers’ Comp State of the Union Address

3 Metrics To Combat Silent Killer Of Workers Comp Costs

3 Metrics To Combat Silent Killer Of Workers Comp Costs

Incentivizing The Right Work Comp Outcomes

Incentivizing The Right Work Comp Outcomes

Improve Workers Compensation Success Through Benchmarking

Improve Workers Compensation Success Through Benchmarking

The Best Tidbits Of News From The Workers Comp Community

The Best Tidbits Of News From The Workers Comp Community

Workers Comp News in Review April 1, 2012

Workers Comp News in Review April 1, 2012

Older Employees Have Smaller than Expected Impact on Loss Costs

Older Employees Have Smaller than Expected Impact on Loss Costs

WCRI Releases Medical Price Index Data for Three States

WCRI Releases Medical Price Index Data for Three States

Free Download

5 Critical Metrics To Measure Workers’ Comp Success - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Train to Succeed

BECOME CERTIFIED IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Proven Course Catalog & WC Toolbox Give You The Power To Achieve Lower Costs and Better Injured Worker Outcomes

VISIT WORKERS' COMP TRAINING CENTER

Previous Post: « OSHA Fines Company 1.2 Million over Asbestos Removal
Next Post: Bulgarian Home Workers Face Low Pay and Poor Working Conditions »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FREE DOWNLOAD

5 Critical Metrics To Measure Workers’ Comp Success - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Our Sponsors

ARCADIA - Enhancing Settlement Outcomes

The Structured Settlements Company
 

Catastrophic and Risk Solutions, Case Management Solutions, and Specialty Networks
 

MSAs, Section 111 Audits, & Conditional Payment Resolutions
 

Post-Settlement Administration
 

Medcor

Injury Triage, Onsite Clinics

Read Our Award-Winning Blog

Blog Categories

Search Our Archive

Subscribe to Our FREE Newsletter

Return-to-Work Essentials

Footer

Search Our Archive

Search our continually growing archive of over 2500 articles about Workers' Comp issues.

Quiclinks

  • Calculators
  • Terms & Abbreviations
  • Glossary of WC Premium Terms
  • WC Resources
  • Best Practices
  • Industries
  • Return-to-Work Essentials

RSS Recent Blog Posts

  • MSP Manual Update Puts MSAs into Motion at Provider Level
  • Know Your Correct Job Classification Codes To Save Workers’ Comp Costs
  • Reducing Work Comp Costs With Field Nurse Case Managers
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FEE NEWSLETTER
Let Us Help You Stomp Down the High Cost of Workers' Comp!
Top of Page ↑
  • Home
  • Training Center
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Products
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Login
Copyright © 2023 Amaxx, LLC. All Rights Reserved. · Privacy Policy / Legal Notice