• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
 
Paradigm

Amaxx Workers Comp Blog

Reduce Workers Compensation Costs By 20-50%

Header Right

  • Home
    • Training Center
  • Search
    • Free Resources & Solutions
    • Subscribe to Free Newsletter
    • Create Free Training Center Account
    • Enroll in On-Demand Courses
    • Activate WC Mastery Membership
    • Request Strategic Coaching Session
    • Buy WC Guidebooks
  • Membership
    • Insider (free account)
    • WC Mastery
    • Teams & Managers Mastery
    • Training Partners
  • Products
    • On-Demand Courses
    • Specialty Courses
    • Certifications & Mastery Courses
    • Ultimate Guidebooks
    • Coaching
  • Blog
    • Video Blogs
    • COVID-19 / Coronavirus Pandemic
  • Login

Mobile Menu

  • Home
    • Training Center
  • Search
    • Free Resources & Solutions
    • Subscribe to Free Newsletter
    • Create Free Training Center Account
    • Enroll in On-Demand Courses
    • Activate WC Mastery Membership
    • Request Strategic Coaching Session
    • Buy WC Guidebooks
  • Membership
    • Insider (free account)
    • WC Mastery
    • Teams & Managers Mastery
    • Training Partners
  • Products
    • On-Demand Courses
    • Specialty Courses
    • Certifications & Mastery Courses
    • Ultimate Guidebooks
    • Coaching
  • Blog
    • Video Blogs
    • COVID-19 / Coronavirus Pandemic
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
  • Privacy
You are here: Home / Medical Cost Containment / Medical Issues / Work Comp Hearing Loss Claims Difficult to Disprove

Work Comp Hearing Loss Claims Difficult to Disprove

October 7, 2010 By //  by Rebecca Shafer, J.D. 1 Comment

A hearing loss claim can be one of the most difficult claims to prove or disprove. High levels of noise at the job location can cause an employee to lose part or all of his or her hearing. Every state, except Alaska, Montana and Nevada, have specific provisions in their workers compensation statutes to address hearing loss claims. (Montana and Nevada treat hearing loss as an occupational disease).

The difficult aspect of hearing loss claims is determining whether the hearing loss is due to aging process [as everyone’s hearing deteriorates as they get older] or is the hearing loss due to exposure to excessive levels of noise in the workplace. The severity of noise-induced hearing loss varies depending on the level of the noise and duration of the noise. Also, each person has a different level of susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss.

While one tremendous explosive sound can cause hearing loss (referred to as a traumatic incident), most hearing loss claims are cumulative – the result of repeated exposure to high noise levels everyday on the job. The hearing loss can be monaural (one ear) or binaural (both ears).

Click Link to Access Free PDF Download

“The 6-Step Process To Determine Workers’ Comp Injury Causation”

To determine the amount of hearing loss an employee has incurred, an Audiologist or a Otolaryngologist tests the employee’s impairment using the American Medical Association’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (in most states, some states use other measuring systems). The employee’s level of hearing at 500 Hertz (Hz), [a Hertz is a measurement of sound waves per second] 1,000, 2,000, 3000, 4000 and 6,000 Hz can be tested, depending on the requirements of the state where the hearing claim is filed.

The results of the hearing test are displayed on a form called an audiogram. The audiogram is used to calculate the degree of hearing loss. Sounds simple? [no pun intended]. It isn’t.

The issues with audiograms include:

  1. The audiometer being properly calibrated.
  2. The cooperation of the employee (is the employee giving the test his best effort to hear).
  3. The employee’s medical status at the time of the test – does the employee have a cold, other physical ailments, earwax?
  4. Knowing when the employee was last exposed to a high noise level prior to the date of the test.
  5. The qualifications of the person administering the test – was the test conducted by an otolaryngologist or was the test conducted by an unsupervised technician?
  6. The audiometric examination being given in a room meeting requirements for the elimination of background noise.

It is not enough for the employee to prove s/he has a hearing loss. A determination of the type of hearing loss is needed. There are three types of hearing loss – conductive loss, perceptive loss and mixed type loss.

A conductive loss of hearing is caused by a defect in the middle ear or the external ear due to disease or injury. It is not caused by noise in the work place.

A perceptive loss of hearing occurs in the middle ear and may be caused by exposure to noise in the work place, or it may be caused by advancing age or infectious disease. Therefore, even if the employee has a perceptive loss of hearing, it may not be caused by the employee’s job. It is up the adjuster and the medical providers to investigate for other possible causes for the perceptive loss.

In a mixed type of hearing loss, the employee has both conductive loss and perceptive loss of hearing. Again, it may or may not be related to his employment.

As an employer you may be thinking “my company should not have any hearing losses, we provide all employees exposed to noise with state of the art hearing protection.” That’s great, but the states vary tremendously in whether or not you owe the claim if the employee fails to use the protective device. Only in Georgia, Iowa, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina, Oklahoma and South Dakota can the failure to use the hearing protective device be used as a reason to deny the workers compensation claim.

Some states will use the failure to use the provided hearing protective device as a reason to impose a percentage reduction in the amount of the indemnity payment for the hearing loss. The states that impose a percentage reduction are Kentucky (15%), Missouri (25% to 50%), New Mexico (10%), Utah (15%) and Wisconsin (15% capped at $15,000). In all the other states, the failure to use the protective device has no impact on the claim or the workers comp statutes are silent in regards to the employee not using the provided hearing protection.

As a hearing loss can be cumulative over many years, the question then becomes which employer is liable for the workers compensation claim? Is it the current employer, or does the responsibility for the hearing loss belong to a previous employer where the employee was exposed to louder and more intense noise? Some states do not address this issue. Some states have statutes protecting the employer from hearing loss that occurred at a prior employer. Some states try to apportion the hearing loss claim amongst the employee’s current and prior employers. Other states allow the employer to implead prior employers into the Workers comp Board case. In Hawaii the current employer is stuck with the hearing loss. In Minnesota and Rhode Island, the employer with the “last significant exposure” gets to pay the entire claim.

FREE DOWNLOAD: “The 6-Step Process To Determine Workers’ Comp Injury Causation”

To protect your company from paying for a hearing loss that occurred prior to the employee coming to work for your company, a pre-employment audiogram should be conducted on every new hire. This provides your company with a baseline for any future hearing loss claim. Even if the employee does incur a hearing loss while working for your company, by having the baseline audiogram, the amount of compensation paid to the employee for the hearing loss will only be for what occurred at your company, unless you are in Hawaii, Minnesota or Rhode Island.

If your employees work where they are exposed to continuous noise, make the wearing of protective hearing gear mandatory. You must make sure employees know the importance of wearing protective hearing gear. Include enforcement of protective safety gear, whether hearing protection or other types of safety gear as a part of the performance evaluation of the supervisors and managers. By using audiograms to establish hearing ability prior to employment and enforcing the use of protective hearing gear during employment, you can eliminate or significantly reduce the number of hearing loss claims against your company.

Author Rebecca Shafer, JD, President of Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. is a national expert in the field of workers compensation. She is a writer, speaker and website publisher. Her expertise is working with employers to reduce workers compensation costs, and her clients include airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. Contact: RShafer@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.

JOIN WC GROUP: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?homeNewMember=&gid=1922050/
SUBSCRIBE TO: Workers Comp Resource Center Newsletter

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.

©2010 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law.

FREE DOWNLOAD: “The 6-Step Process To Determine Workers’ Comp Injury Causation”

Filed Under: Medical Issues Tagged With: Hearing Loss, Pre-Employment Screening

Related Articles

Marijuana: A Medical Perspective — White Paper

Marijuana: A Medical Perspective — White Paper

The Impact Of Artificial Disc Technology On Work Comp

The Impact Of Artificial Disc Technology On Work Comp

The Hunt for Medical Provider Fraud

The Hunt for Medical Provider Fraud

One of Biggest Shams in Comp Claims Is Unwarranted Diagnostic Testing

One of Biggest Shams in Comp Claims Is Unwarranted Diagnostic Testing

Are Diagnostic Testing And Physical Therapy Overused In Workers Comp?

Are Diagnostic Testing And Physical Therapy Overused In Workers Comp?

How You Can Prevent Pain Medication From Causing More Pain

How You Can Prevent Pain Medication From Causing More Pain

Top 6 Causes of Workers Comp Injuries and How to Avoid Them

Top 6 Causes of Workers Comp Injuries and How to Avoid Them

New Opioids Being Developed to Decrease Abuse, Save Work Comp Costs

New Opioids Being Developed to Decrease Abuse, Save Work Comp Costs

Exposure to Diesel Fumes Proven to Cause Cancer

Exposure to Diesel Fumes Proven to Cause Cancer

Kansas Division for Workers Comp Takes Huge Step In Ankle Replacement

Kansas Division for Workers Comp Takes Huge Step In Ankle Replacement

The Best Tidbits of News from the Workers Comp Community

The Best Tidbits of News from the Workers Comp Community

$39 Million in Illness Compensation Further Clarified

$39 Million in Illness Compensation Further Clarified

Train to Succeed

BECOME CERTIFIED IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Proven Course Catalog & WC Toolbox Give You The Power To Achieve Lower Costs and Better Injured Worker Outcomes

VISIT WORKERS' COMP TRAINING CENTER

Free Download

The 6-Step Process To Determine Workers' Comp Injury Causation - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Previous Post: « AUSTRALIA Dealing with Bogus Sales Safety Calls
Next Post: Australia Tells Overseas Workers How Not To Be Victims of Exploitation »

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Roger Diller

    November 6, 2019 at 10:08 pm

    I worked ,in lumber mill, in Libby,.t. for 21 years. I have hearing loss.am I entitled to hearing aids

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FREE DOWNLOAD

The 6-Step Process To Determine Workers' Comp Injury Causation - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Our Sponsors

The Structured Settlements Company
 

Catastrophic and Risk Solutions, Case Management Solutions, and Specialty Networks
 

Post-Settlement Administration
 

Medcor

Injury Triage, Onsite Clinics

Read Our Award-Winning Blog

Blog Categories

Search Our Archive

Subscribe to Our FREE Newsletter

Return-to-Work Essentials

Footer

Search Our Archive

Search our continually growing archive of over 2500 articles about Workers' Comp issues.

Quiclinks

  • Calculators
  • Terms & Abbreviations
  • Glossary of WC Premium Terms
  • WC Resources
  • Best Practices
  • Industries
  • Return-to-Work Essentials

RSS Recent Blog Posts

  • Five Things to Include in Your Workers’ Comp Communication Policy
  • An Advocacy Approach in Claims Handling
  • Appreciation in Workers’ Compensation
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FEE NEWSLETTER
Let Us Help You Stomp Down the High Cost of Workers' Comp!
Top of Page ↑
  • Home
  • Training Center
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Products
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Login
Copyright © 2022 Amaxx, LLC. All Rights Reserved. · Privacy Policy / Legal Notice