• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
 

Amaxx Workers Comp Blog

Reduce Workers Compensation Costs By 20-50%

Header Right

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help
  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
You are here: Home / EEOC Discrimination Laws / Improperly Implemented Pre Employment Screening Cost Nearly One Million Dollars

Improperly Implemented Pre Employment Screening Cost Nearly One Million Dollars

August 28, 2009 By //  by Robert Elliott, J.D. Leave a Comment

To repeat our “siren song:” It’s the goal of every employer to reduce, reduce workers’ compensation cost. Laws suits, fines, non-compliance with federal and state laws COST MONEY.

Pre-employment screening is a tool employers use to determine whether applicants can safely perform the jobs they are hired for and locate workers who are otherwise qualifed for the jobs for which they are applying. It is not meant to be used to discriminate against classes of workers, as one employer discovered. Be careful your policies don’t unintentially discriminate against a protected class.

Manufacturer Pays Dearly for Engaging in Hiring Discrimination

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) reports a large, well-known southern manufacturer agreed to settle findings of hiring discrimination against 1,912 rejected minority and female applicants for entry-level positions engaged in for a period of one year.

During a scheduled compliance evaluation of the employer, OFCCP investigators alleged hiring disparity in:

1. Inconsistent selection procedures for entry-level positions.
2. Use of pre-employment tests negatively impacting minority applicants and insufficient evidence of validity to support test use.

In addition to paying the 1,912 applicants $900,000 in back pay with interest, the company must:

1. Discontinue use of the test in question when hiring for entry-level positions.
2. Provide 61 entry-level positions, (11 already filled).
3. Undertake extensive self-monitoring measures to ensure all hiring practices fully comply with the law and immediately correct any discriminatory practices. (workersxzcompxzkit)
4. Ensure compliance with Executive Order 11246 record-keeping requirements.

The Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs enforces Executive Order 11246 and other laws prohibiting employment discrimination by federal contractors.

Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers’ Compensation costs, including airlines, health care, manufacturing, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. He can be contacted at: Robert_Elliott@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com or 860-786-8286.

Free WC Management IQ Test: http://www.workerscompkit.com/intro/
WC Books: http://www.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/workers-comp-books-manuals.php
WC Calculator: www.reduceyourworkerscomp.com/calculator.php
Follow Us On Twitter: www.twitter.com/WorkersCompKit
Do not use this information without independent verification.
All state laws vary.

©2008 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@WorkersCompKit.com

Filed Under: EEOC Discrimination Laws Tagged With: Combating Fraud, Legal Issues: Employers & Employees

Related Articles

Ten Things Workers Say About Workplace Bullying

Ten Things Workers Say About Workplace Bullying

National Insurer Sued under ADA For Failure to Hire Methadone User

National Insurer Sued under ADA For Failure to Hire Methadone User

Woman Fired After Alleging Harassment, Court Takes her Side

Woman Fired After Alleging Harassment, Court Takes her Side

Using Racial Profiling Eatery Owner Refuses Service

Using Racial Profiling Eatery Owner Refuses Service

Alcoa Mill to Pay Nearly $485K in Discrimination Cases

Alcoa Mill to Pay Nearly $485K in Discrimination Cases

Discrimination Alive and Well in the Global Workforce

Discrimination Alive and Well in the Global Workforce

Ohio Fire Chief Loses Discrimination Suit in Federal Court

Ohio Fire Chief Loses Discrimination Suit in Federal Court

Online College To Pay $260,000 To Settle EEOC Lawsuit Charging Sexual Harassment

Online College To Pay $260,000 To Settle EEOC Lawsuit Charging Sexual Harassment

Wal-Mart Opens Up Checkbook to Compensate Group of Hispanic Employees

Wal-Mart Opens Up Checkbook to Compensate Group of Hispanic Employees

Minnesota Must Pay 467K to Settle Age Discrimination Claims by Workers

Minnesota Must Pay 467K to Settle Age Discrimination Claims by Workers

Supreme Court Rules Employers Liable for Discriminatory Firing

Supreme Court Rules Employers Liable for Discriminatory Firing

Iowa Woman Wins 2.3 Million Lawsuit against Employer

Iowa Woman Wins 2.3 Million Lawsuit against Employer

Free Download

5-Step Sequence to Coordinate Return-to-Work with ADA Compliance - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Train to Succeed

BECOME CERTIFIED IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Proven Course Catalog & WC Toolbox Give You The Power To Achieve Lower Costs and Better Injured Worker Outcomes

VISIT WORKERS' COMP TRAINING CENTER

Previous Post: « Reduction in Workplace Deaths in Indiana Reduces WC Costs
Next Post: Misclassification of Employees Can Result in Workers Comp Premium Problems and Overtime Lawsuits »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FREE DOWNLOAD

5-Step Sequence to Coordinate Return-to-Work with ADA Compliance - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Our Sponsors

Catastrophic and Risk Solutions, Case Management Solutions, and Specialty Networks
 

WC Cost-Driver Metrics Suite

Blog Categories

Search Our Archive

Subscribe to Our FREE Newsletter

Return-to-Work Essentials

Footer

Search Our Archive

Search our continually growing archive of over 5,000 articles about Workers' Comp issues.

Quiclinks

  • Calculators
  • Terms & Abbreviations
  • Glossary of WC Premium Terms
  • WC Resources
  • Best Practices
  • Industries
  • Return-to-Work Essentials

RSS Recent Blog Posts

  • What to Do When Injured Employees Can’t Come Back
  • Innovation from National Comp: Paradigm’s Hero MSK Program
  • Why ‘Counting Paperclips’ Hurts More Than It Helps in Return-to-Work Programs
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FEE NEWSLETTER
Let Us Help You Stomp Down the High Cost of Workers' Comp!
Top of Page ↑
  • Home
  • Training Center
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Products
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Login
Copyright © 2025 Amaxx, LLC. All Rights Reserved. · Privacy Policy / Legal Notice