• Menu
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary navigation
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Before Header

  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
 

Amaxx Workers Comp Blog

Reduce Workers Compensation Costs By 20-50%

Header Right

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help

Mobile Menu

  • Home
  • Books
    • Big Book
    • Mini Book
  • Training
    • WC Mastery Membership
    • Course Curriculum
    • Certified Master of Workers’ Compensation
    • Certified Master of WC – Best in Class
  • Coaching
    • CompElite Strategic Coaching for Employers
    • BrokerElite Coaching for WC Business Growth
  • IMR Software
    • IMR Comprehensive
    • IMR Metrics Suite
  • Blog
  • WC Help
  • About
  • Search
  • Resources
  • Privacy
  • Contact
You are here: Home / EEOC Discrimination Laws / South Dakota Medical Clinic Settles Pregnancy Discrimination Case

South Dakota Medical Clinic Settles Pregnancy Discrimination Case

June 28, 2010 By //  by Robert Elliott, J.D. Leave a Comment

Siouxland Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Associates LLP of Sioux Falls, S.D., has agreed to pay $95,000 in punitive damages and attorneys’ fees, in addition to $23,775 paid earlier this year for lost earnings and interest, to resolve a pregnancy discrimination lawsuit brought by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
 
The case was brought on behalf of two pregnant women discriminated against in 2002, the agency announced. The EEOC’s suit charged one employee was fired days after Siouxland learned of her pregnancy, and a few months later, Siouxland refused to hire another woman after learning in an employment interview that she was pregnant. (WCxKitz)
 
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, makes it unlawful for an employer to discriminate based on pregnancy when making hiring or employment decisions. The EEOC filed suit after first attempting to reach a voluntary settlement out of court through its conciliation process.
 
There was a jury trial on the case in Sioux Falls in April 2007, where the jury found that Siouxland had intentionally discriminated against both women because of their pregnancies and awarded $21,098 in lost earnings.
 
EEOC appealed because the trial judge refused to give the jury an instruction on punitive damages. Under the Civil Rights Act of 1991, punitive damages are available where it is proven that the employer engaged in discrimination with malice or reckless indifference to the civil rights of the claimant. (WCxKitz)
 
On Aug. 27, 2009, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision upholding the jury verdict for the claimants, and additionally holding that the jury should have been instructed on punitive damages. [See EEOC et al v. Siouxland Oral Maxillofacial Surgery Associates, L.L.P., 578 F.3d 921 (8th Cir. 2009).]
 
As a result of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals decision, the case was returned to Sioux Falls for a second trial on punitive damages. This second trial was scheduled for June 22, 2010. After the appeal was decided, Siouxland paid the two women $23,775 for the back pay amounts previously awarded, plus interest. As a result of the parties’ agreement to resolve the remaining punitive damages and attorneys’ fees claims for $95,000, the case is now completely resolved.
 
The settlement agreement filed in U.S. District Court for Southern District of South Dakota (EEOC, et. al. v. Siouxland Maxillofacial Surgery Assoc., LLP CIV. 044215) also includes Siouxland’s agreement to provide training for Siouxland employees and supervisors on sex and pregnancy discrimination as well as reporting by Siouxland to the EEOC on other complaints of sex discrimination, including pregnancy bias.
 
“This was a clear-cut case of blatant pregnancy discrimination,”EEOC Appellate Attorney Daniel Vail said, “and the evidence the EEOC presented at trial showed that the decision makers at Siouxland knew that their actions were illegal. The EEOC will prosecute these cases vigorously – at trial and on appeal – including seeking punitive damages against employers who either maliciously or recklessly violate the rights of pregnant women.” (WCxKitz)
 
Mary Jo O’Neill, regional attorney for the EEOC’s Phoenix District, which litigated the case with lawyers from its Denver and Albuquerque offices along with private counsel, said, “In recent years, we have seen a very significant increase in the number of pregnancy discrimination charges where women are fired, not hired, or treated differently solely because they are pregnant. We are pleased with the result in this case, which sends a powerful message to employers that this kind of discrimination can be very costly for them.”
 
  \Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers’ Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. Contact:  Robert_Elliott@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com   or 860-553-6604.

FREE WC IQ Test:
 http://www.workerscompkit.com/intro/
WC Books:  
http://www.LowerWC.com/workers-comp-books-manuals.php
WC Calculator:  http://www.LowerWC.com/calculator.php
TD Calculator:  http://www.LowerWC.com/transitional-duty-cost-calculator.php 

Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers' comp issues.

©2010 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact
Info@WorkersCompKit.com 

Filed Under: EEOC Discrimination Laws, Employment Law Issues Tagged With: Legal Issues: Employers & Employees

Related Articles

Deny Work Comp Claims From Disallowed Unemployment

Deny Work Comp Claims From Disallowed Unemployment

Reducing Workers’ Compensation Costs Through Baseline Testing

Reducing Workers’ Compensation Costs Through Baseline Testing

Independent Contractors: Are You an Employee?

Independent Contractors: Are You an Employee?

Employers, Work Comp, And “Diligent Over-Compliance”

Employers, Work Comp, And “Diligent Over-Compliance”

Don’t Hire Your Next Workers Compensation Claim

Don’t Hire Your Next Workers Compensation Claim

Reminder of a NY Decision on Illegals and Workers Comp

Reminder of a NY Decision on Illegals and Workers Comp

Employer Involvement in Work Comp Claims Can Not Be Delegated

Employer Involvement in Work Comp Claims Can Not Be Delegated

Workers Compensation, Employment, and Disability Laws

Workers Compensation, Employment, and Disability Laws

When an Employee Dies

When an Employee Dies

Health Care Workers in the Netherlands Feel the Pressure of Poor Working Conditions

Health Care Workers in the Netherlands Feel the Pressure of Poor Working Conditions

Apple Computer Supplier Gets Audit of Labor Practices

Apple Computer Supplier Gets Audit of Labor Practices

New Toolkit for Workplace Health Programs Unveiled by U.S. Chamber of Commerce

New Toolkit for Workplace Health Programs Unveiled by U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Free Download

5-Step Sequence to Coordinate Return-to-Work with ADA Compliance - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Train to Succeed

BECOME CERTIFIED IN WORKERS’ COMPENSATION

Proven Course Catalog & WC Toolbox Give You The Power To Achieve Lower Costs and Better Injured Worker Outcomes

VISIT WORKERS' COMP TRAINING CENTER

Previous Post: « Tips from Ted: Know These Five Sources of Information for a New York Work Comp Claim, or Any Other State
Next Post: Ireland Health and Safety Authority Inspections Increased by 15% »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

FREE DOWNLOAD

5-Step Sequence to Coordinate Return-to-Work with ADA Compliance - FREE Download Click Here Now!

Our Sponsors

Catastrophic and Risk Solutions, Case Management Solutions, and Specialty Networks
 

WC Cost-Driver Metrics Suite

Blog Categories

Search Our Archive

Subscribe to Our FREE Newsletter

Return-to-Work Essentials

Footer

Search Our Archive

Search our continually growing archive of over 5,000 articles about Workers' Comp issues.

Quiclinks

  • Calculators
  • Terms & Abbreviations
  • Glossary of WC Premium Terms
  • WC Resources
  • Best Practices
  • Industries
  • Return-to-Work Essentials

RSS Recent Blog Posts

  • Think You’re Too Big to Worry About Frequency? Think Again
  • Can a High Deductible Plan Help Lower Your Mod?
  • The 70% Discount You Might Be Missing in Workers’ Comp
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FEE NEWSLETTER
Let Us Help You Stomp Down the High Cost of Workers' Comp!
Top of Page ↑
  • Home
  • Training Center
  • Search
  • Membership
  • Products
  • Blog
  • About
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
  • Login
Copyright © 2025 Amaxx, LLC. All Rights Reserved. · Privacy Policy / Legal Notice