Nearly one year ago, Bill 168, an Act to amend Ontario’s Occupational Health and Safety Act with respect to violence and harassment in the workplace, officially took effect. Bill 168 also added the requirement for employers to introduce measures to address domestic violence as a potential source of workplace violence.
As the Workers Health & Safety Centre points out, these amendments placed significant duties on employers relating to workplace violence and harassment. Top among employer obligations is the requirement to develop and implement workplace violence and harassment policies and program(s). To this end the employer must also provide all workers with information and instruction on the content of the workplace policies, hazard control measures, and other procedures outlined in the program designed to implement the policies. (WCxKit)
When companies are not in compliance, workers are at risk and employers open to possible repercussions. Ontario Ministry of Labour (MOL) inspectors undertook a compliance blitz between May 1, 2010 and August 31, 2010, focusing on workplaces employing new and young workers.
According to the MOL, violence and harassment prevention efforts mandated by the Act accounted for 15% of non-compliance orders written for industrial workplaces and 14% for health care facilities.
The Workers Health & Safety Centre (WHSC) can help as it offers handy compliance checklists for both employers and workers. The WHSC also offers a three-hour Workplace Violence and Harassment Prevention training program designed to help prepare workplaces for a better understanding of workplace violence and harassment and to reach full compliance with the workplace prevention obligations required under the Act. Finally, the WHSC has published fact sheets on workplace and domestic violence relating to the workplace. (WCxKit)
Workplace Violence: Predictable and Preventable is now updated to reflect Bill 168. Domestic Violence in the Workplace: Breaking the Silence outlines how domestic violence can become a workplace issue and highlights the responsibilities legally required of employers who are aware, or ought to be reasonably aware, that domestic violence can most likely expose a worker to physical injury occurring in the workplace.
Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact:Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com .
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.
I interviewed Alice Martinson, MD about soft tissues injuries, one of her passions after almost 40 years as a board-certified orthopaedic surgeon, 25 of which were as a Naval Medical Officer.
You mentioned loss control was of interest — which areas in particular are of interest?
What I'm most interested in is loss control through the prevention of musculoskeletal injury. I have seen so many work-related injuries in my long career that I know did not have to happen if folks had used common sense. After seeing the same injury pattern happen over and over again when it does not have to happen, I have come to believe that if I know of simple prevention strategies, I should pass them on whenever I can. Nothing discourages me more than to see an individual's personal and economic future compromised by a preventable injury.
How can employers benefit from having a loss control program in that area?
Musculoskeletal injuries are far and away the most common work-related injuries – particularly back injuries. For a company to focus on employee output while overlooking employee safety is self-defeating, because lost work days and medical costs directly affect the bottom line. (WCxKit)
What type of loss control is used for prevention of musculoskeletal injuries — like low back — is it ergonomics, job matching, physical demands job descriptions, others?
I'm glad you asked about assessment of job demands. That is probably the most overlooked aspect of loss prevention. Far too many company leaders have no real idea of the physical demands made on their employees. Careful job analysis will be eye-opening for a great many of them, and it will also let a prospective employee know more accurately what is expected in the jobs they are taking on. In my view the easiest and most effective loss prevention strategy is job matching. It is pretty hard to do properly when the actual physical requirements of the jobs are not appreciated. A good example of this would be hospital nursing or radiologic technician job descriptions. They carefully spell out the intellectual and administrative roles these folks are supposed to play, but nowhere in the ones I have read is it mentioned that the job requires moving many patients who are physically impaired or unpredictable.
Some hospitals have finally come to understand the risks their professionals undertake in these jobs and have established "lifting teams." The following links are to the press release and to the published study of the consequences of one such effort: https://www.miamivalleyhospital.org/mvhdefault.aspx?id=10770 and www.innovations.ahrq.gov/content.aspx?id=1813.
Ergonomic analysis is a logical follow-on to job demand assessment. Once you see clearly the actual nature of the jobs that need doing, it is usually not hard to figure out a way to get them done better and more safely – that's what ergonomics is in a nutshell.
The reports from the hospital cited above clearly demonstrate that what makes any loss prevention strategy effective is commitment to the goals and principles of maintaining a healthy, safe workforce. If, however, the incentives are concentrated just at the worker-supervisor interface, those incentives inevitably turn to suppression of work injury reports as employees get the message injuries "are not tolerated.” As in all other leadership challenges, enthusiasm and sustained attention to detail are the keys to successful implementation of loss prevention strategies, and those things HAVE to come from the top down.
Are there specific injuries that can be avoided?
The most fruitful area to start in is prevention of low back injuries. The first and most obvious loss prevention strategy is to match the employees' capabilities to their assignments. Pre-employment screening, except in highly-selected cases, is not cost effective. Keep it simple. A woman who is 5' 2" can no more safely lift a 70-pound object of irregular shape than she can fly. Yet in the past month I have evaluated several cases where that is exactly how she was injured, because that is what her job required her to do. The same can be said about morbidly obese individuals. Almost all of them have some degree of lumbar spine pathology, and if they are required to lift large heavy objects, it is only a matter of time before they will get a compensable back injury, because the bulk of their bodies does not allow them to use the proper lifting mechanics.
The situation of morbidly obese employees in general is another area where prevention can be fruitful. Osteoarthritis of the knees is virtually universal in long-standing obesity. If such a person is placed in a job requiring frequent squatting or climbing of stairs and ladders, they will develop knee pain and one or more surgical procedures is sure to follow. Somewhat akin to the knee injuries are shoulder injuries. Morbidly obese individuals cannot arise from a chair without using their arms. Shoulders were not designed to be weight-bearing joints, so when they are used for that purpose, they break down. Large rotator cuff tears and shoulder arthritis will develop, and if a shoulder becomes painful in the course of work that stresses that joint, the problem will end up being compensable as well. (WCxKit)
Please understand – I am not saying that obese individuals should not be hired or that they do not make good employees. Nonetheless, it is in everyone's best interest that the individual's capabilities match the job and the risks he or she is being assigned to undertake. Most companies of any size have employee assistance programs for those who are having problems with abuse of tobacco and other substances. Obesity is the abuse of food. Developing a meaningful incentive program to support and encourage obese employees in the weight loss process pays off many times over by improving employee health, minimizing lost time from work, cutting down on both workers compensation and health insurance costs, and preventing a lot of personal misery. Besides – it is the right thing to do.
Author: Alice M Martinson, MD has practiced for 40 years as a board-certified orthopaedic surgeon, 25 of which were as a Naval Medical Officer. Relying on her extensive military experience with injury evaluation, she performs IMEs and consults on loss control issues. Contact: 870-480-7475 or docalice@aol.com. Go to our Directory to read more about Doc Alice. See LowerWC.com for more information. Contact: info@reduceyourworkerscomp.com.
Read more by Dr. Alice Martinson: The Role of Chronic Soft Tissue Overload Syndrome and Lower Workers Comp Costs and: An MD Explains How Stretching Helps Relieve Postural Strain Complaints in the Upper Back.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.
Often it is assumed the designated adjuster(s) working on your workers compensation files is a good adjuster. But, you know what “they” say about “assuming.” Use these eight tips to judge your adjuster(s) overall ability and effectiveness.
1. Timely Contact with All Parties
Track how often the adjuster makes timely contacts. If your Best Practices say claimants, medical providers, and the employee's supervisor must be contacted within 24 hours of the first report of an accident, expect your adjuster to be making timely contacts with all parties at least 90% of the time. The higher the percentage, the better. Timely initial contacts go a long ways toward establishing the future tone of your claims and establish the adjuster as the person in charge. (WCxKit)
2. The Accuracy of Reserves
When you look at your loss run and compare what the claim settled for against the claim reserves you gain insight into the ability of the adjuster to evaluate the claim. If you see a lot of reserve changes right before the claim settles, then the adjuster is either inexperienced at evaluating the claim or is indifferent to the impact reserves have on your company. If you see the reserves on the claim were established since the adjuster obtained key medical information on the injured employee, you know the adjuster is looking out for your financial interests.
3. Responsiveness
Does the adjuster always answer the phone when you call, or do you often have to leave messages and wait a few days to hear back? When you send e-mails, do you get a prompt response, or do you forget what the subject of the e-mail was by the time the adjuster responds? A good adjuster tries to keep you informed about your claims and takes the time to respond to your questions and needs. The quicker the response from the adjuster, the better the adjuster.
4. Payments Timely
If your employee complains the TTD or TPD check did not arrive on time, then the adjuster is not organized (or may have too many claims to handle properly). You should expect never to hear from an employee about the indemnity check not arriving. If your employees are receiving dunning notices from their doctors on medical bills, then the adjuster is not processing the bills timely. While any adjuster may occasionally have a medical bill or other missed expense, you or your employees should not be constantly getting reminders on medical bills.
5. The Number of Employees Lost to Attorneys
The good adjuster stays in contact with employees out on workers comp. The great adjuster builds rapport with the employees and the employees make an effort to keep their adjuster informed as to their medical progress and their ability to return to work. The poor adjuster has a higher percentage of employees represented by an attorney then the good adjuster. As the percentage of employees represented by attorneys is impacted by the legal climate in your locale, you must consider the results of your adjuster compared to other adjusters in the same locale.
6. Knowledge of Workers Compensation
When you have a question about workers comp in general, the good adjuster can answer it for you, (or at least get you the answer). If the adjuster does not know the answer, or tells you it would be better for you to talk to a workers comp attorney or the adjuster's supervisor, the adjuster's workers comp knowledge is weaker than it should be. The good adjuster knows all the ins and outs of state statutes and is willing to share that information with the employer.
7. Claim Quality Audit Scores
Often claim offices do not want to talk about their claim quality audit scores. This often arises out of a concern that the employer may not understand that the 100% perfect claim file seldom happens. However, the good workers comp adjuster scores in the 90+ percentile. Ask the adjuster for a copy of the most recent audit score. The good adjuster is glad to share it with you. The weak adjuster probably has reasons why it cannot be shared.
8. Closed Files Reopened
Every adjuster knows the best file is the closed file. However, it is seldom a good idea to close a file prematurely. The good adjuster makes sure all aspects of the claim are resolved, all medical bill paid, all indemnity checks issued, and all expenses paid before closing the file. If you see more than a few reopened files on the loss run report, than the adjuster is closing claims prematurely. (WCxKit)
None of these 8 criteria alone indicate a good or poor adjuster. When the adjuster is strong in all 8 areas, you have a great adjuster working your claims. If the adjuster is weak in most of these areas, it is time to consider requesting another adjuster to handle your workers comp claims. Having a strong adjuster on your claim files makes your life easier and saves money. A few select TPA's DO actually "grade" their adjusters, giving monthly bonuses to those that excel, and get high grades – nearing 100.
Author Rebecca Shafer, JD, President of Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. is a national expert in the field of workers compensation. She is a writer, speaker, and website publisher. Her expertise is working with employers to reduce workers compensation costs, and her clients include airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality, and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact: RShafer@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com or 860-553-6604.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.
Finding a way to press on with accident and ill health prevention during difficult economic times is the theme this year of Scotland’s foremost safety event. In 2009-10 there were 23 worker fatalities, 2,548 reported major injuries to employees, and 7,992 over three day injuries to employees reported in Scotland.
According to the Royal Society for the Prevention of Accidents (RoSPA), everyday accident and ill-health issues facing firms will be thoroughly investigated at the RoSPA Scotland Safety and Health Forum, taking place at the Hilton Glasgow Hotel on September 21, 2011. The event is an evolution of the popular RoSPA Scotland Occupational Safety and Health at Work Congress and the title reflects a more dynamic learning experience. For more information visit: www.rospa.com/events/scotlandforum. (WcxKit)
Delegates at the forum will explore current and future health and safety issues in the wider context of budget cuts by getting involved with interactive workshops, discussion groups, and panel interviews — learning from each other as well as experts.
Chaired by Tom Mullarkey, RoSPA's chief executive, the conference is expected to attract a range of top safety stakeholders, including company directors, senior managers, health and safety advisers, and human resource professionals.
The event opens with a panel of experts taking part in a discussion entitled “A Day in the Life of Health and Safety: Overcoming Your Operational Challenges,” expected to provide solutions to real issues raised by delegates.
A variety of workshops covering safety leadership, communication, and health and wellbeing will take place, with plenty of top tips and practical advice given by prominent Scottish health and safety professionals.(WcxKit)
Two case studies will enable delegates to take away practical advice from the real world of business. One focuses on finding opportunities amid budget cuts. The second reviews a genuine accident autopsy, looking at how it happened, and what it really cost.
Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact: Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.
A British worker suffered fatal head injuries recently when he was struck by a steel barrier while carrying out maintenance on a machine.
Balbir Rayatt, 55, from Ilford, Essex, worked as an engineering and maintenance manager for car mat manufacturer Cannon Automotive Limited in Tottenham, London. (WCxKit)
On May 20, 2008, Rayatt suffered fatal head injuries when the heavy steel fabrication barrier fell on him while carrying out repairs on a rubber-mixing machine.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) investigation revealed the barrier had been stored vertically and unsecured against rubber compound powder containers. The court heard the firm failed to assess the risks and implement a suitable and sufficient safe system of work for the maintenance of the mixer.
City of London Magistrates’ Court heard Cannon Automotive Limited did not supervise, manage, monitor, audit or review its arrangements regarding maintenance operations on the mixer to ensure they met the health and safety standards.
Cannon Automotive Limited of Tottenham, London, pleaded guilty to breaching Section 2(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974. It was fined a total of $33,266 and ordered to pay costs of $21,836.39.
Speaking after the prosecution, HSE Inspector Neil Fry noted, "This tragic death was utterly preventable. Poor standards and failure to keep working environments in a good condition are a major cause of these types of incidents and also occupational diseases.
"Maintenance is a process that affects every aspect of safety and health and when a tragedy such as this occurs it demonstrates the importance of planning when carrying out maintenance work. (WCxKit)
"Unfortunately it is too late for Mr. Rayatt, but I would hope employers in London and around the UK will take note."
Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact:Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com or 860-553-6604.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@WorkersCompKit.com.
Wal-Mart Stores Inc. came out on the losing side of its appeal of the majority of a $187.6 million verdict for Pennsylvania hourly workers who allege the world's largest retailer disallowed meal and rest breaks.The case was brought on behalf of some 187,000 present and former Wal-Mart Pennsylvania employees working from 1998 to 2006.They contended the Arkansas-based employer took part in improper practices to enhance productivity, increase profit, and trim expenses.
According to a report from the Economic Times, the three-judge panel of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania said there was sufficient evidence for Philadelphia jurors in 2006 to conclude that Wal-Mart's practices violated state wage and hour laws. It also claimed Wal-Mart's own internal review brought up violations related to "off-the-clock" work.(WcxKit)
The record reflects testimony and documentary evidence suggesting that because of pressure from the home office to reduce labor costs and the availability of significant bonuses for managers based on store profitability, Wal-Mart's scheduling program created chronic understaffing, leading to widespread rest-break violations according to the appeals court records.
It nonetheless instructed the trial court to recalculate a $45.6 million award of legal fees, claiming that court erred by "double-counting" some factors.
The case was brought by Michelle Braun and Dolores Hummel, who had respectively worked in Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores in eastern Pennsylvania, and drew on evidence from some 46 million shifts according to court records.(WcxKit)
Citations: Braun et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al and Hummel et al v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc et al, Superior Court of Pennsylvania, No. A21033/09.
Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact: Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com or 860-553-6604.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.
Most employers like to think that their workers compensation claims office, whether it is with their workers compensation insurer or with a third party administrator (TPA), has their best interests in mind. In most cases, they do. But, there are areas where the claims office may put their own self interest ahead of the best interest of the customer – you the employer. Here are some of the situations where the claims office does not want you to know what is going on.
1. The Bigger the Account, the Better the Service
The claims office, whether a part of the work comp insurer or a part of a third party administrator, is in business to make money. The bigger the client, the more money the claims office receives for handling their claims. While large accounts can have some minor impact on the pricing of claims services, the cost to handle a workers compensation claim is roughly the same regardless of whether it comes from the largest account or the smallest account. Hence, the bigger the account the more important it is to the claims office profit. The management of the claims office will strive harder to provide the level of service needed to keep the big accounts happy. If you are a small or middle-size employer, you are often better off being with a smaller insurer or TPA (better to be the medium size fish in the pond, then to be a minnow in the ocean) that provides boutique service and is willing to customize their services. (WCxKit)
2. What Gets Reviewed Gets Done
If you report your workers compensation claim and then forget about it, that is usually okay with the adjusters (however, they do love it when you provide a modified duty return to work program which gets the claims closed faster). But, if you have a program where you check the medical status of each injured employee each month until they are back at work, the adjuster(s) soon learn to be up-to-date on the medical status of each of your employees. If you have a monthly round-table discussion on the progress of your larger claims, the adjuster(s) soon know to be sure the claim keeps moving forward so they can report positive results. If you have an independent Best Practices Audit done every six months or annually, the adjuster(s) learn to comply with your Best Practices requirements.
3. We Don't Like Dedicated Adjusters
One of the best ways to minimize the hiccups and hitches in handling your claims is to have a dedicated adjuster(s) assigned to your account. The dedicated adjuster works only on your work comp claim files and soon knows exactly how you want things done. That is great for you, but it creates some staffing issues for the claims office. The number of claim files – the claim volume – fluctuates in the claims office. When the claim volume increases, they want to spread out the additional claims to all their adjusters so they can get additional income without hiring additional people. However, if you have a dedicated adjuster assigned to your account only, they can not assign the additional new files to "your" dedicated adjuster(s). On the flip side, when claim volume decrease and they have to reduce staff, your dedicated adjuster is harder to terminate, as they do want you to be unhappy and take your claims business elsewhere. It is more cost-effective to provide "designated" rather than "dedicated" adjusters. In many cases, it may serve you better to use the designated adjuster model.
4. Our Mistakes Cost You Money
When the claims office provides poor service and the lack of good claim handling skills cause the work comp claim to cost more than it should, the claims office will not call you up and say “sorry, we did a bad job, here is your money back." Both the frequency and the severity of claims is used to calculate your workers compensation premium. When any aspect of the Best Practices is not done, the result is normally a higher claim payment – severity. That “extra” severity is money out of your pocket with future higher workers compensation premiums.
5. We Do Not Like Client Instructions
One of the biggest mistakes the self-insured employer can make is to not have their own set of client instructions. The claims office management will tell you “we have a stringent set of best practices” with the hope that you will let them go their merry way doing things the way they want to do them. When you provide a custom set of client instructions, then the claims office feels a certain amount of pressure to do it your way, especially when you call them on it when they deviate from your client instructions. Your own customized client instructions to do it your way combined with your dedicated adjuster(s) will result in much higher product quality in the claims office.
6. We Love Medical Case Management
To keep the claims office profit at the optimum, the claims office management strives to keep every adjuster with a full case load. Sometimes, the full case load gets a bit too full for the adjusters. When the client has a medical case management program, the triage team or the nurse case manager can provide important information to the adjuster without the adjuster having to take time to develop the information her/his self, and RNs provide additional insight into the medical conditions. The saved phone calls to the medical providers, and the time saved coordinating medical care for the employee makes the life of the work comp adjuster a bit easier, but it is not an easy job!
7. We Have a Lot of Information We Never Share
As the claims handling world has become computerized (for the most part), a ton of information is now available in the claims management information systems (computers). The insurer or the TPA will usually offer to provide you with the basic loss run. However, with the modern computer systems, you can slice and dice the information just about any way you want. Want to know how many “accidents” are reported on Monday morning? You can a request a computer run by date of loss. Want to know your average number of days of TTD payments? The computers can calculate that. The claims office may not bring you suggestions on how they can provide you with more information, but if you have an information question that can be measured, ask the claims office to share the information with you.
A bi-annual roundtable with your entire claims team (in person, the old-fashioned way) build relationships and provides a forum for adjusters to make suggestions that can improve your workers compensation claims handling program.
Author Rebecca Shafer, JD, President of Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. is a national expert in the field of workers compensation. She is a writer, speaker, and website publisher. Her expertise is working with employers to reduce workers compensation costs, and her clients include airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality, and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact:RShafer@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com or 860-553-6604.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@WorkersCompKit.com.
Key congressional leaders recently received draft legislation to address needed reforms in the federal occupational safety and health laws to help improve workplace safety and health in the United States from the American Society of Safety Engineers (ASSE).
According to the ASSE, the bill, entitled “Enhancing Occupational Safety and Health Protections in the 100th Year Act of 2011,” is intended to help improve OSHA and NIOSH capabilities and better encourage employer responsibility for worker safety and health. (WCxKit)
The comprehensive draft legislations a first for ASSE, which was celebrating its 100th anniversary as a society last week in Chicago, during their 44th annual Professional Development Conference.
“While the direct responsibility for saving lives and preventing injuries and illnesses in this nation’s workplaces rests with employers, we can all do a better job of helping them and encouraging them to meet that responsibility,” said ASSE President Darryl Hill in letters to the chairman and ranking members of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions and the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. “For the past 100 years, ASSE’s member occupational safety, health, and environmental professionals have worked day and night in all industries to prevent workplace injuries and illnesses. They have seen results but at the same time know that more needs to and can be done,” Hill added.
Hill noted this is an important time for the profession and for ASSE. “That’s why, on this our 100th Anniversary, ASSE offers this draft legislation to build on what we have learned is missing in the way this nation oversees workplace safety and health. After 40 years of the OSHA Act and other decisions made following its passage in 1970, workers should be able to rely on a thoughtful reexamination of that Act’s effectiveness, which we hope our draft legislation encourages.”
In his letters, Hill notes that the changes to the OSHA Act ASSE offers are structural in nature, meant to help OSHA work better, be more effective in its outreach, and keep up with rapidly advancing knowledge about how to protect workers and workplaces. (WCxKit)
ASSE’s bill contains provisions on coverage of public sector employees; updating permissible exposure limits; advancing a risk-based regulatory approach; encouraging collaborative rulemaking; enhanced definition of competent person; encouraging OSHA consideration of voluntary consensus standards; enabling OSHA to update standards with voluntary consensus standards; relocation of NIOSH within the Department of Health and Human Services; increased criminal penalties for those responsible for safety culture in an organization; encouraging employer risk assessment through third party consultations; encouraging risk assessment through safety and health audit privilege; codification of the Voluntary Protection Program (VPP); and expanded access to VPP for small businesses.
Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact: Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.
Following the death of a resort mechanic who died while working on the attraction in March, Walt Disney World, Florida is keeping the roller coaster ride closed through the summer as federal investigators continue a safety review.
According to a number of media outlets, including The Associated Press and The Miami Herald, Disney recently extended the closure of Primeval Whirl, a spinning coaster in Disney’s Animal Kingdom that has been closed since January for maintenance, until at least September 14, 2011. The reopening of the ride, initially slated for April, already was postponed once, until early June 2011. (WCxKit)
The attraction, opened in April 2002, is a pair of wild mouse-style roller coasters operating side by side featuring spinning, four-person ride vehicles falling through a series of tight, flat turns.
The new date coincides with a six-month deadline facing the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to finalize its investigation into the passing of Russell Roscoe, a 52-year-old attractions mechanic hit by one of the attraction’s ride vehicles on March 13th. Roscoe suffered a massive head injury and died the following day.
Disney reported on June 7th some of the planned maintenance for Primeval Whirl was moved back to accommodate the accident investigation. The resort stated the new reopening date is not related to OSHA’s timeline. Resort officials would not comment on what changes they are making to the 9-year-old ride, or whether they are completing any safety adjustments.
Note: If one searches through legal data bases, there are many injuries on amusement park and water park rides. My first product liability case, in fact, was an amusement ride — a water park ride in New Hampshire — where coincidentally a high school friend was vacationing in New Hampshire with his family when he went down the waterslide head first — a position which was allowed on the slide despite the fact there had been several previous injuries which all occurred when users rode the waterslide in a head first position. In these injuries, there may be lawsuits as well as claims that are discoverable.
Author Rebecca Shafer, J.D., President, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 25 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs and implement litigation management systems. Her clients have included: airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact: Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.
The New South Wales (NSW) government rejected the Australian Federal Government’s proposed Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) reforms, while Queensland was first to implement the laws aimed at harmonizing national workplace safety standards.
Australian Industry Group chief executive, Heather Ridout welcomes the "first big piece in the mosaic of Occupational Health and Safety (OHS) reform” and commended Queensland on the passage of the Work Health and Safety Bill through the state parliament. (WCxKit)
"Similar bills are before the South Australian and NSW Parliaments, and are expected to be tabled in all other States and Territories and the Federal Parliament in the coming months," Ridout commented in a statement. "However, in NSW, where the passage requires the support of minor parties, any amendments moving away from the Model Law risk defeating the purpose of the whole exercise should be strongly resisted.”
Despite Ridout’s caution, NSW government recently rejected a key element of the Federal Government’s proposed OHS laws. During evidence to a Senate Estimates Committee, NSW confirmed its OHS laws would be different from the rest of Australia.
In NSW, unions retained the rights of unions to prosecute employers and be eligible to receive part of the penalty for a successful prosecution under the proposed reforms. A report in early May suggested OHS cases would be heard by the mainstream courts.
However, Liberal Senator for Tasmania, Eric Abetz criticized the news saying the right of unions to prosecute and the reverse onus of proof in NSW hinders the state’s economy and its ability to invite investment into the state.
Abetz argued for the two provisions not replicated in other states as they present onerous conditions for businesses to abide by. Should the OHS reform pass through parliament, these laws will, from January 1, 2012, enable Australia to operate for the first time under a uniform law for workplace safety. Ridout said the laws are not about “states rights,” but safety — an issue to which each state is being asked to make a contribution.
"Removing confusing and contradictory differences between current state laws allows workplaces to concentrate on working safely, rather than facing a complex legal nightmare," Ridout added in the same statement. “Harmonization is driven by industry, unions, and safety professionals for this reason. Governments have also supported this principle and the remaining states are urged to follow Queensland’s lead and complete the legislative task.”
Queensland Industrial Relations Minister, Cameron Dick, who introduced the Work Health and Safety Bill 2011 into Parliament in May, said the new legislation upholds the state's stringent workplace safety laws and results in harmonized workplace laws across Australia.
For workers, Dick said, the new laws mean more stringent protection; while for business, they mean reduced red tape and compliance costs.
"Removing the confusion, complexity and duplication caused by Australia's multiple workplace health and safety regimes help save the Queensland economy more than $30 million a year,” Dick said. (WCxKit)
The new bill replaces the Queensland Workplace Health and Safety Act 1995 with key changes such as broadening the definition of “worker” to include labor hire, contractors and subcontractors, and imposing the onus of proof on the regulator to prove an offense.
Author Robert Elliott, executive vice president, Amaxx Risks Solutions, Inc. has worked successfully for 20 years with many industries to reduce Workers Compensation costs, including airlines, healthcare, printing/publishing, pharmaceuticals, retail, hospitality and manufacturing. See www.LowerWC.com for more information. Contact:Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com or 860-553-6604.
Do not use this information without independent verification. All state laws vary. You should consult with your insurance broker or agent about workers comp issues.
©2011 Amaxx Risk Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved under International Copyright Law. If you would like permission to reprint this material, contact Info@ReduceYourWorkersComp.com.